Eclipse of the Synod: New Catechism to Launch in Rome
...Note well that none of the above is really anything new. In fact, Credo reads like any of the veteran Catholic catechisms of the past millennium, although including contemporary applications of the same timeless moral principles.
Lionel: False .
Credo is written with the objective and factual error in the 1949 Letter of the
Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston. Also the past Catechisms are
interpreted with the same error i.e when they mention invincible ignorance or
the baptism of desire, they both are projected as visible exceptions for the dogma
extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215).
This is a major error in philosophy and theology and is politically correct with the Left - but it is not Catholic.
______________________
Therefore,
if Credo is not true, then it demands
official censorship from the Vatican—an act that will require its opponents to
marshal a propositional demonstration of how Credo is manifestly in error
concerning the Faith.
Lionel: Bishop Athanasius Schneider interprets Vatican Council II with the same false premise as the popes from Paul VI.There are now many Catholics who interprets LG 8, LG 14, LG 15, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being only hypothetical cases always. So Vatican Council II nowhere contradicts the dogma EENS, the ecumenism of return of the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Athanasius Creed.For Bishop Schneider there are exceptions for the Athanasius Creed for me there are no exceptions. If there were no exceptions for the Athanasius Creed for him then he would be a Feeneyite on Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms and Councils and EENS.
Whoever desires to be saved should above all hold to the Catholic Faith.Anyone who does not keep it whole and unbroken will doubtless perish eternally.-Athanasius Creed.
______________________
Of course, this is something its opponents cannot do, as the book is simply “a guide to the changeless teaching of the Church.” To condemn Credo would thus be to affirm, in a public manner, that Church teaching has changed—at which point the faithful should respond with St. Paul: “Though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema” (Gal 1:8)!
Lionel: Interpreting
invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible
ignorance as being visible exceptions for traditional extra ecclesiam nulla
salus, has not been part of the Catholic Church's traditional teaching. The old
exclusivist theology has been rejected by Schneider and Kwasniewski and there is a new theology which says
outside the Church there is known salvation in the present times, there is
salvation. So the dogma EENS has been made obsolete. They are politically correct. They cannot be accused of being Feeneyites.
_______________________
And yet, if the
revolutionaries leave Credo uncontested, they must tacitly affirm it as an
authentic expression of Catholic doctrine, voiced by the ordinary teaching
office of the living bishopric (how collegial, synodal, and decentralized!).
Lionel: We have a politically correct Cushingite bishop who does not want to be accused of being a Feeneyite and so face excommunication or laicization. So he has allowed the teachngs of the Church to be changed.He has maintained his ecclesiastical status and is approved by his superiors.If Credo was Feeneyite neither Sophia or Angelus Press would be allowed to publish it.
________________________
We may therefore
return to our comparison. Does your priest, bishop, or pope believe the
following teaching, expressed in the pages of Credo?
Are all religions, with their respective forms of worship, equally pleasing to God?
No. Only the
religion established by God and fulfilled in Christ, with its divinely revealed
worship, is supernatural, holy, and pleasing to God. All other religions are
inherently false, and their forms of worship pernicious, or at least unavailing
for eternal life.
Lionel: The above statement is
true but it is contradicted when Bishop Schnedier and Peter Kwasniewski
interpret Vatican Council II irrationally i.e they project LG 8, LG 14, LG 16,
UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus . So for
them not everyone needs to enter the Catholic Church for salvation. There are
exceptions. So with this new theology they negate the above statement.
This was also the mistake of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX
bishops.
This is dishonesty. Since even after being informed they continue with this
error and do not discuss it.
Peter Kwasniewski does not want to be stopped from writing books and speaking at conferences and so he is not discussing the mistake in Credo.He needs Vatican Council II to be a rupture with Tradition. He needs the hermeneutic of discontinuity with Tradition. Credo is conspicuous for what it does not say.
https://catholicism.org/
The theology of the Credo ignores the traditionalists of the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center, in New Hampshire, USA.
- Lionel Andrades
____________________________
https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2023/10/eclipse-of-synod-new-catechism-to.html#more
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment