Mattei at a restaurant in Rome yesterday

 

Roberto dei Mattei, President of the Lepanto Foundation, and director of the magazine Radici Cristiane and the news agency Corrispondenza Romano, was seen at a restaurant yesterday afternoon in Rome.

Mattei continues to not affirm Vatican Council II and interprets the Council like the dubbia Cardinals and Pope Francis. This is the political- left line of Alberto Melloni of the FSCIRE for whom the Council has only a hermeneutic of rupture, with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Fourth Lateran Council (1215).

Mattei, who also writes for the SSPX media and does not ask the SSPX to interpret Vatican Council II rationally. He also is not in a position to ask the cardinals at the Synod or his media to interpret the Council rationally, since then he would be accused of being Anti Semitic etc and his media and income will be targeted. Now, he can eat at restaurants comfortable.He keeps quiet on this issue.

 If he interpreted the Council rationally like me, he will not be allowed to hold Conferences. Since not only the Fourth Lateran and he Council of Florence which defined EENS, is declared Feeneyite and Anti Semitic but also Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845, 846, 1257 etc).

So he allows the Synod to get by without pointing out that cardinals Grech and Hollerich and Sr. Nathalie Bequart have said that the Synods are based upon Vatican Council II. Cardinal Marx said the same before. Pope Francis has not denied it. They all mean Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally. For them LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to physically visible non Catholics saved in the present time outside the Church without faith and baptism.This is a new doctrine of Mattei.

So Reuters and the other news agencies say Vatican Council II is a revolution in the Catholic Church. Even Pope Francis believes Vatican Council II is a revolution in the Church and so faith, morals, mission, ecclesiology, ecumemism, inter-religious dialogue etc can be changed by interpreting the Council deceptive and unethically like prudent Mattei.

Also other media, like those of Michael Voris, Michael Matti and John Henry Weston are following the same prudent policy when reporting on the Synods.

The five dubbia cardinals are avoiding being laicized if they interpret Vatican Council II with LG 8 etc referring to hypothetical and invisible cases only. 

Yet this is common sense. One does not have to be a theologian to understand this. But cardinals Burke and Brandmuller in their second dubbia are careful not to bring out this truth and take the Church back to Tradition. They have not discussed Vatican Council II rational and irrational, probably for personal and political reasons.

There is no mention of it in both their dubbias.

Even the SSPX priests at Albano who offer Holy Mass in Rome do not want to affirm Vatican Council II rational and admit that Archbishop Lefebvre and the present SSPX bishops made a mistake. LG 8 etc always refer to invisible cases. The baptism of desire (LG 14) and being saved in invincible ignorance(LG 16) was never an exception for the Fourth Lateran Council etc.

 -Lionel Andrades

 

https://www.robertodemattei.it/il-sinodo-i-dubia-e-il-papa-che-verra/