OCTOBER 9, 2023
For Father Paulo Boumis there are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance but he will continue to have adult catechesis this month in which he will interpret BOD and I.I as being physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Church, in the present times, who are practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is also the theological position of the SSPX and the sedevacantists.
For Father Paulo Boumis there are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance but he will continue to have adult catechesis this month in which he will interpret BOD and I.I as being physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Church, in the present times, who are practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is also the theological position of the SSPX and the sedevacantists.  Cardinal Angelo Donatis, Vicar General of the Rome Vicariate, and his Auxiliary bishops know the same, as does the National Catechetical Center, Italy, but they will teach Catechism, with this objective error, since this is what Pope Francis wants, in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. They are not concerned about the truth or the faith, but, they are concerned about the political Left.  So if I was presenting the Catechism in the parish of Sant Agapito, Rome, I would say outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation and I would cite Ad Gentes 7, Lumen Gentium 14 and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845,846). For me, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc would not be objective exceptions, for Ad Gentes 7 and the dogma EENS. Fr. Paul Boumis avoided a discussion on this subject yesterday morning. He did not say that he would interpret Vatican Council II rationally. I base what I am saying on Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the priest could tell other religious to avoid me? Yes. Since the priest will affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church but interpret hypothetical cases of LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc, are referring to objectively visible cases. For me they are invisibile. For him there are visible examples of salvation outside the Church. For me they are hypothetical only. For him this refers to known non Catholics saved outside the Church. For me they are invisible cases. So our premises and inferences are different. So of course our conclusions would be different, they would be traditional or non-traditional. So if I was presenting the Catechism in the parish of Sant Agapito, Rome, I would say outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation and I would cite Ad Gentes 7, Lumen Gentium 14 and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845,846). For me, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc would not be objective exceptions, for Ad Gentes 7 and the dogma EENS. Fr. Paul Boumis avoided a discussion on this subject yesterday morning. He did not say that he would interpret Vatican Council II rationally. I base what I am saying on Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the priest could tell other religious to avoid me? Yes. Since the priest will affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church but interpret hypothetical cases of LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc, are referring to objectively visible cases. For me they are invisible. For him there are visible examples of salvation outside the Church. For me they are hypothetical only. For him this refers to known non Catholics saved outside the Church. For me they are invisible cases. So our premises and inferences are different. So of course our conclusions would be different, they would be traditional or non-traditional. - Lionel Andrades |
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment