The Church Militant Board of Directors who have ousted Michael Voris are ‘immoral’ when they continue to interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms irrationally and not rationally for political-Left reasons.

 

The Church Militant Board of Directors who have ousted Michael Voris are ‘immoral’ when they continue to interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms irrationally and not rationally for political-Left reasons. - Lionel Andrades

NOVEMBER 17, 2023

Conservative Catholics hold politically correct conferences

 

Michael Voris called a Press Conference at Baltimore the other day, it was announced. He did not announce that Vatican Council II has a harmony with the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (which he denies). He needed to be politically correct with the leftist establishment in Detroit and the USCCB bishops meeting in Baltimore. CMTV criticizes the USCCB bishops for wanting to be politically correct.

John Henry Weston and Michael Matt held a conference in Rome and did not announce that they interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being only hypothetical  They have lost interest in Catholic Tradition.It  can be too expensive for them. They are not announcing that Vatican Council II is no more a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Catechism of the Catholic Church of Pope Pius X.

The Annual Catholic Identity Conference was held and the speakers chose to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition. Edward Pentin’s employment depends upon maintaining this lie.

Other Catholics, politically correct with the Left, held conferences in the USA. Some of them criticized Pope Francis and the Synods for being politically correct with the Left.

If someone meets Roberto dei Mattei and Christopher Ferrara and asks them if LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible cases- they will not answer.

Since if they answer YES, it would mean that LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, being invisible, are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church. They are not practical and known exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in 1949-2023. They would be supporting Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston and suggesting that the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office made a mistake.

But LG 8 etc are always invisible cases in our human reality. They can only be known to God.

But the ‘traditionalists’ know that Vatican Council II will be supporting Feeneyite EENS with Ad Gentes  saying all need faith and baptism for salvation. All. While LG 8, 14, 15 16 etc are not exceptions for Ad Gentes 7 or the dogma EENS. The Council does not contradict the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church. Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Michael Davies, Romano Amerio and SSPX bishops made an objective error.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church says all need to enter the Church for salvation, the Church is like the Ark of Noah that saves in the flood (845). We now know there are no exceptions for CCC 845 mentioned in Vatican Council II.

God the Father wants all to be united in the Catholic Church (845). There are no exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II and there are none known in real life.

This is not mentioned by Archbishop Carlo Vigano in the regular statements he is issues. The Council has continuity with Tradition but he wants to interpret it irrationally and then suggests it should be scrapped.

-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/11/conservative-catholics-hold-politically.html