So for the parish of Sant Agapito in Rome for the first time someone has told them that Vatican Council II can be interpreted rationally and it is not a break with Tradition

 

 

When in the parish of Sant Agapito Largo Preneste near Termini, Roma the priests and the laity make the visible-invisible distinction in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, then the community is saying outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation ( AG 7, LG 14, CCC 845,846 etc) and LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc are not objective exceptions.The community returns to Tradition at the Novus Ordo Mass in Italian.

The Sant Agapito Experience I mentioned in a previous blog post is not based upon the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or the Latin Mass but Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. There are many good apologetic books and resources but they all interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.

 Fr.Leonard Feeney, Brother Francis Maluf f.i, Brother Thomas Augustine f.i and Brother Andre Marie micm, did not interpret Vatican Council II rationally. They have been interpreting Vatican Council II like others who attend the Latin Mass but also like the liberals. The SSPX also interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally and then rejects, correctly, the irrtional version. But the SSPX does not interpret the Council rationally in harmony with Feneeyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

 They all did not interpret LG 8, 14, 1 5, 16, UR 3 NA 2, GS 22 etc as being physically invisible and not visible cases in 1949 to 1965 and the later years. Similarly Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the founders of the Ecclesia Dei communities also did not interpret LG 8 etc rationally. Instead they interpreted, and still interpret, the Council like the liberals and the Left.

So for the parish of San Agapito in Rome for the first time someone has told them that Vatican Council II can be interpreted rationally and it is not a break with Tradition.  - Lionel Andrades