The SSPX priests have to politically teach error in their catechesis otherwise they will be expelled.The Superior General of the SSPX winks and looks the other way as the National Catholic Reporter, the Crux, Commonweal, Tablet, National Catholic Register, EWTN, Catholic News Agency and Catholic News Service interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.

Even after being  informed the SSPX priests  who feature on the video series Crisis in the Church, interpret Vatican Council II politically, that is, with a fake premise and inference to provide a rupture with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the exclusivist Athanasius Creed and Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.

Over some 10 years there have been so many reports on the Internet which interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, as referring to only invisible cases. So invisible cases cannot be objective and visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. They are only exceptions, if they are physically visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church. But we humans cannot see or meet such cases. This would only be known to God. 

But it is with this irrationality that the present Superior General of the SSPX, Fr.Davide Pagliarani interpreted Vatican Council II when he was the Rector of the SSPX seminary in Argentina.

So many priests of the SSPX who were expelled because they would not accept Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally were never told to see LG 8,14,1,5,16,UR 3, NA 21, GS 22 etc , as being only hypothetical cases always.

The 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (LOHO) to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney made an objective mistake on the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.The LOHO contradicted even St. Thomas Aquinas.

Aquinas held the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS. He did not project 'the man in the forest saved in invincible ignorance', as an exception. He knew this was a hypothetical case. But the SSPX, the popes, the liberals and the Jewish Left projected ‘the man in the forest’ as a physically visible and known case of someone saved outside the Church.The Americanists and Pope Pius XII accepted the 1949 LOHO as did the popes who followed.

It was with the LOHO irrationality, i.e confusing what is invisible as being visible that the SSPX priests over the years interpreted Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. It was irrational for Bishop Athanasius Schneider to interpret invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance, Lumen Gentium 16, as being physically visible. So exceptions emerged for the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church.

When there was the expected non-traditional conclusion of Vatican Council II, then Vatican Council II, liberal and irrational, was rejected by the SSPX.

If Pope Paul VI and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre had interpreted Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church rationally ( i,e invisible cases are always invisible only),  as some SSPX priests in Rome did, then this would not be accepted by the SSPX Headquarters in Switzerland.

Now the SSPX priests are piling up videos on this series, which all interpret LG 8,14,1,5,16 etc, irrationally, to produce a non traditional conclusion.

The SSPX priests have to politically teach error in their catechesis otherwise they will be expelled.

Even Bishop Richardson and the bishops whom he ordained, avoid the Anti Semitic label as do the cardinals and bishops who offer the Novus Ordo Mass , throughout the world.

The Superior General of the SSPX winks and looks the other way as the National Catholic Reporter, the Crux, Commonweal, Tablet, National Catholic Register, EWTN, Catholic News Agency, Catholic News Service interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.  -Lionel Andrades