The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) expelled Bishop Richard Williamson to avoid the Anti Semitic charge against the main body. Now the SSPX is not affirming the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and neither are they interpreting Vatican Council II rationally.
It is the same with the liberal correspondents of the National Catholic Reporter, Tablet, and Crux etc.
Even Bishop Richard Willianson and the new bishops ordained by him do not interpret LG 8,14,1,5,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as referring to only
hypothetical cases. They refer to invisible people in 1965-2024.
Roberto
dei Mattei is playing it safe. He has posted a report on the prudent weblog,
Rorate Caeili on, Dismas, the Good Thief. Mattei probably wants to avoid the Anti Semitic charge.It is the same with Fr.John Zuhlsdorf and others who
offer/attend the Latin Mass.
So for Fr.John Zuhlsdorf Dismas the Good Thief, who allegedly went to
Heaven without the baptism of desire would be a known exception to
the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS ) in 2018. This is LOHO reasoning.
An invisible person in 2018 is an example of salvation outside the Church
for him. He is an exception to all needing to enter the Church for
salvation.This is the LOHO reasoning of those who do not want to affirm the
strict interpretation of the dogma EEN.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/04/frjohn-zuhlsdorf-still-uses-loho.html
Roberto dei Mattei, Fr. John
Zuhlsdorf, and Joseph Shaw, John Henry Weston, Michael Matt and Archbishop Carlo Vigano choose to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally
and so avoid the Anti Semitic accusation.They have money in the bank.
Whom do we know in 2018 who will be a Dismas or
is a Dismas. Even if there was a person saved outside the Church, it
would not be known to us. So it is irrelevant to Feeneyite
EENS.
But for Fr.Zuhlsdorf invisible and hypothetical cases mentioned in Lumen
Gentium, Vatican Council are concrete and known examples of salvation outside
the Church and so contradict Feeneyite EENS for him. He is a liberal.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/04/frjohn-zuhlsdorf-still-uses-loho.html
We have the liberals
and traditionalists today who reject traditional Catholic doctrine to
maintain their tax exempt status. They also do not correct the mistake in
the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston.
LOHO is heretical. Since its philosophy
says there are invisible people who are visible and they are not Catholics. The
theology says these 'visible' non Catholics are saved without Catholic faith
and the baptism of water. So the conclusion is that not every one needs to be
incorporated into the Catholic Church as a member.There is known salvation
outside the Church.
Fr.Zuhlsdorf is a Cushingite
like Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria and the rest at Ecclesia Dei
today.
In his report on Dismas today he does not mention EENS
however Dismas is often cited as an exception to Feeneyite EENS.
In the past Fr. Zuhlsdorf has criticized Fr.Leonard
Feeney for his 'hard line position' on EENS since Fr. Zuhlsdorf accepts
the irrational reasoning of LOHO and also wrongly interprets Vatican Council II
with this reasoning.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/04/frjohn-zuhlsdorf-still-uses-loho.html
-Lionel Andrades
Saint Dismas: the Good Thief -- by Roberto de
Mattei
https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2024/03/saint-dismas-good-thief-by-roberto-de.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment