Cardinal Sean of O' Malley and the bishops of Manchester and Worcester,
USA - like the St. Benedict Centers, USA - are saying that outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation.This is when they interpret Vatican Council II with
LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, and GS 22 as invisible people in 1965-2024. This
is Vatican Council II (rational) which restricts them to the past exclusivist
ecclesiology and the Athanasius Creed. Cardinal Sean O’Malley, the Archbishop
of Boston and his Curia are saying that all non Catholics are oriented to the
fires of Hell without Catholic faith and the baptism of water (Ad Gentes 7,
Vatican Council II) in the Catholic Church. There are no known exceptions for
Ad Gentes 7 in real life and none mentioned in Vatican Council II. Though
politically liberal and with the Left, the Archbishop and the suffragan bishops,
are limited to Tradition by Vatican Council II (rational). Ethically, they can
only interpret the Council rationally.
When the bishops interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial
Documents (Creeds, Councils, Catechisms etc) rationally, they return to the
past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church, still upheld by the St. Benedict
Centers in the suffragan diocese of Manchester and Worcester. Doctrinally, the
bishops are in unity on doctrine with Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston, Brother
Francis Malus micm and Sister Catherine Clarke Goddard micm. They are saying,
like the Auxiliary bishops and Vicar General in Rome, that Jews, Muslims,
Hindus, Buddhists and atheists, have to accept Jesus in the Catholic Church (
AG 7, LG 14, CCC 845,846,1257 etc). The Bible tells us that Catholic Church is
the Mystical Body of Jesus (Cf. 1 Cor 12:12-31;
Col 1:18; 2:18-20; Eph. 1:22-23; 3:19; 4:13).
They are saying like my Parish Priest, Fr. Paulo Boumis, when he
interprets the Council rationally, that Muslims and Jews are oriented to Hell.
For salvation from Hell, they all need to accept Jesus and follow his teachings in
His Mystical Body the Catholic Church. This is the Conciliar teaching ( AG 7,
LG 14).It is Vatican Council II interpreted rationally in harmony with
Tradition ( Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX etc).
For me too, all Muslims in general need to enter the Catholic Church to
avoid Hell (for salvation). Jesus is the only Savior of the world, he saves us
from Hell. This is my Catholic belief. I am following the teachings of the Catholic Church. It is also the Catholic belief of the
Missionaries of Charity of Mother Teresa, Sisters and Brothers.
So this is the mainstream teaching of the Catholic Church in Rome and
the USA according to Magisterial-texts interpreted rationally i.e not confusing what is invisible as being visible. It is magisterial, according to the rational interpretation of Vatican
Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church and other Magisterial
Documents.
Pope Francis and Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez have an obligation to
interpret Vatican Council II rationally, to be magisterial. They cannot choose
a Fake Premise ( invisible people are visible in 2024) to make the Council a rupture
with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and to make the Catechism of the
Catholic Church, contradict itself i.e. CCC 847-848 would contradict CCC
845-846, for them, but not for me. Since for them CCC 847-848 refer to visible and known exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( CCC 845-846).
The U.S bishops in order not to offend people who are intolerant of
Catholic beliefs and the Catholic Church keep quiet. However the teachings of
the Catholic Church are consistent and not changeable. The liberalism which has
come into the Church in New England, USA is due to the cardinals and bishops
not interpreting Vatican Council II rationally.
Now that Vatican Council II, rational, has been identified the cardinals
and bishops can correct the common error in the Church.
It is now known that there are no visible cases of someone being saved
with the baptism of desire(BOD) and in invincible ignorance(I.I). So the BOD and I.I and Vatican
Council II (LG 8 etc) do not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus, which was
defined by three Church Councils. The archbishop of Boston must apologize for
the excommunication of Fr. Leonard Feeney.
Fr. Leonard Feeney, like Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor
Marshall, was saying that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire. - Lionel Andrades
https://www.sjs.edu/theological-institute
https://psjs.edu/
https://www.rmsboston.org/
_________________________________________
JULY 16, 2012
BISHOPS OF BOSTON, WORCESTER, MANCHESTER AGREE WE DO NOT KNOW ANY CASE OF SOMEONE SAVED WITH IMPLICIT DESIRE OR INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE: SO THERE IS NO CONTRADICTION OF THE LITERAL INTERPRETATION OF THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
MONDAY, MARCH 4, 2024
Catholic Theology 7 : Pope Francis is not telling Wikipedia, the Jewish Anti Defamation League (ADL) and Cardinal Sean O ‘Malley that the 60-plus years interpretation of Vatican Council II is now obsolete.The interpretation of Vatican Council II by Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School (FSCIRE) which Pope Francis supports and that of Ursula Von der Leyer of the European Commission, is not Catholic. Catholics are now interpreting the Council differently.
ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH ( SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA
POPE FRANCIS OBSOLETE
The interpretation of Vatican Council II by Pope Francis is obsolete and Catholics are not obliged to follow it. He needs to interpret the Council rationally for it to be magisterial. Instead he interprets invisible cases of LG 8,14,1,5,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church in the present times ( 1965-2024) and so for him they are objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors and the Catechism of Pope Pius X. They contradict the past exclusivist ecclesiology which is obsolete for him. Seminarians and priests are being cancelled who do not interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16 etc irrationally like him.
Seminarians and priests should be allowed to interpret invisible cases of LG 8 etc as being just invisible. So Vatican Council II, in LG 8 etc, does not contradict Tradition.
Bishops and priests will be ‘cancelled’ even if they accept Vatican Council II and interpret it rationally. So Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider do not interpret Vatican Council II rationally.
None of them are giving an interview to Steve Bannon with Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.No one is telling Steve Bannon and Donald Trump that Vatican Council II is conservative. Instead the North American College, the U.S seminary in Rome, the Paulist Fathers at St. Patrick’s church in Rome, the church for the American community, interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.They are as obsolete as Pope Francis and the Society of St. Pius X.
BEDA PONTIFICAL SEMINARY, ROME
For me LG 8, 14, 1, 5, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to physically invisible cases in 2024. This is not my personal theology or theory but common sense. Even non Christians agree with me. I am simply pointing out an objective error being made in the Catholic Church, a common mistake.
But the result is that I am not being allowed to continue my studies in philosophy and theology in Rome. Neither am I allowed to enter a seminary for late vocations like the Beda Pontifical College in Rome, under the bishops of England and Wales. At this seminary, every seminarian has to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. The faculty and students have to interpret invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, as being visible exceptions for EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) of Pope Honorius III who approved the Dominican Order.
DOMINICAN MASTER GENERAL IRRATIONAL
Today the Dominican Master General interprets not only Vatican Council II irrationally, but also the Creeds, old Councils and all the Catechisms. For example, the Catechism of the Catholic Church (847-848 on invincible ignorance) would contradict CCC 845-846, for them. But not for me. Since CCC 847-848 refer to invisible and hypothetical cases only for me.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church (1257. The Necessity of Baptism) which says God is not limited to the Sacraments , would contradict itself (1257).Since it also states that the Catholic Church knows of no means to eternal salvation other then the baptism of water. There is no contradiction for me. Since only God can know who will be saved without the baptism of water. We do not know any such exception for the dogma EENS.
In the Catechism of Pope Pius X 29 Q (invincible ignorance) would be an exception for 24Q, 27 Q (outside the Church no salvation/other religions are not paths to salvation). Since 29 Q refers to invisible cases, it does not contradict 2Q and 27 Q for me.
CDF ASKS ST.BENEDICT CENTER, NH TO BE IRRATIONAL
But the religious community the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire were asked officially and in public, to interpret CCC 847-848 as a break with CCC 845-846 and the dogma EENS. They refused to do so. They interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church rationally and honestly. They accept Pope Francis as the pope. Yet they have been accused of being ‘a sect’ by a section of the Left.Fr.Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar of the Diocese of Manchester in NH interprets Vatican Council II and EENS (baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance) irrationally and dishonestly. His interpretation is heretical, non traditional and schismatic and yet he is not being accused of being in ‘a sect’ with Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester, USA.
ST.BENEDICT CENTER ACCEPTS CHURCH DOCUMENTS INTERPRETED RATIONALLY
At the St. Benedict Center, the religious community the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary accepts all Church Documents which they interpret only rationally. Bishop Peter Libasci, like Cardinal Sean O ‘Malley, the Archbishop of Boston, also accept all Magisterial Documents but interpret them only irrationally.
Catholics in Boston and Manchester have to follow them legally with this irrational interpretation otherwise a leftist Decree of Prohibitions will be issued, against each of them, approved by the Vatican and the Left.
Canonists and Catholics at large could in future demand that Cardinal Sean O’Malley, Bishop Peter Libasci and Bishop Robert McManus (bishop of Worcester, New England, and USA) be honest and coherent.
Presently Cardinal Sean O ‘Malley, Bishop Robert McManus and Bishop Peter Libasci’s interpretation of Vatican Council II, EENS, the Creeds and Catechisms is as dishonest as Simcha and Damien Fisher in New Hampshire. They are not only denying the dogma EENS and rejecting the Athanasius Creed (all need to be Catholic for salvation) but are re-interpreting the Nicene Creed.
The Creed for them is ‘I believe in three or more known baptisms ; physically visible baptisms, for the forgiveness of sin and it excludes the baptism of water. They are visible baptisms, of desire, blood, being saved in invincible ignorance, being saved in imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3), being saved outside the visible boundaries of the Catholic Church where the Church subsists and which are known to us (LG 8) etc.
The Nicene Creed, it may be mentioned, is recited at the Novus Ordo Mass and also Holy Mass in other rites.
Pope Francis is not telling Wikipedia, the Jewish Anti Defamation League (ADL) and Cardinal Sean O ‘Malley that the 60-plus years interpretation of Vatican Council II is now obsolete. The interpretation of Vatican Council II by Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School (FSCIRE) which Pope Francis supports and that of Ursula Von der Leyer of the European Commission, is not Catholic. Catholics are now interpreting the Council differently.
Canon Lawyers must start ‘ticking off’ bishops,
who legally, do not interpret Vatican Council II,
honestly.-Lionel Andrades
MARCH 3, 2024
Catholic Theology 6 : Bishops will now be forced to support the conservatives and not the Left , Canonists must note, since the interpretation of Vatican Council II has changed with the rational premise ; 'the red is not an exception for the blue '.
FRIDAY, MAY 19, 2023
Cardinal Sean O Malley and the bishops in Boston and New England must be asked to interpret Vatican Council II only rationally and so affirm Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and have it taught in the schools, adult catechesis etc. The bishop of Manchester and Worcester can no more interpret Vatican Council II deceptively in public. They must affirm the strict interpretation of EENS of the St. Benedict Center in their diocese.
Cardinal Sean O Malley and the bishops in Boston and New England must be asked to interpret Vatican Council II only rationally and so affirm Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and have it taught in the schools, adult catechesis etc. The bishop of Manchester and Worcester, suffragen dioceses of Boston, can no more interpret Vatican Council II deceptively in public. They must affirm the strict interpretation of EENS of the St. Benedict Center in their diocese.
The Decree of Prohibitions issued against the St. Benedict Center in the diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, must also apply to the bishop and Curia, in Manchester, once they interpret Vatican Council II rationally. For then they would be affirming Feeneyite EENS or EENS according to the Councils which defined EENS in the 13th and 15th century.
Catholic schools in the diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, USA have still not switched to Vatican Council II ( rational) which is in harmony with the dogma EENS according to Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Center in Boston.
There are no exceptions for EENS in the text of Vatican Council II when the Council is interpreted rationally i.e. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to only hypothetical cases. They are theoretical and exist only in our mind. They are not objective non Catholics. They are not known people saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water. So LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc are not exceptions for the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) on EENS. There are no visible cases in 1965-2023.
Catholics students in Manchester should be taught that outside the Church there is no salvation. This is the teaching of Vatican Council II (LG 14, AG 7) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845,846 etc).
Also religious communities in Manchester should be free to affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechisms in harmony with the Council of Florence (1442) and the Fourth Lateran Council (1215).
The Catholics Church's teachings in Manchester is being questioned since Magisterial Documents ( Creeds, Catechisms ) including Vatican Council II are being interpreted irrationally and politically. This is unethical. This is not the Catholic Faith. Liberalism cannot be produced by re-intepreting what is invisible(LG 8 etc) as being physically visible examples of non Catholics saved outside the Church in the present times (1965-2023).
In New Hampshire, Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester, held a religious program in the church for the police some time back.He did not tell them to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and honestly - and so in harmony with the centuries old understanding of EENS. EENS today is the same as it was for the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century. -Lionel Andrades
MAY 18, 2023
Cardinal Sean O’Malley and all the auxiliary bishops in Boston would be Feeneyite on extra ecclesiam nulla salus if they did not interpret Vatican Council II irrationally
Cardinal Sean O’Malley and all the auxiliary bishops in Boston would be Feeneyite on extra ecclesiam nulla salus if they did not interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. For it is by interpreting LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being invisible people in 2023 that exceptions are produced for Feeneyite EENS. Invisible cases must not be visible examples of salvation outside the Church. But we know that LG 8 etc can only be visible for us human beings. So they are never practical exceptions for EENS. The 1949 Letter of the Holy Office made a mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case. The 1949 Letter to the Archbishop of Boston confused invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invisible ignorance, as being visible exceptions for EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council( 1215) and the Council of Florence (1442).This was an objective error.
So at all Catholic schools in Boston, Catholics should be taught to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and affirm Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
In the pews in Boston, Catholics are not united on the Creeds. Since with the irrational and rational interpretation of Vatican Council II there are two interpretations of the Nicene Creed, two interpretations of the Athanasius Creed etc.- Lionel Andrades
MAY 17, 2023
Bishop Peter Libasci the bishop of Manchester in New Hampshire, USA and his Curia are avoiding a Decree of Prohibitions being issued against them by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. They do this by interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2021
Without the False Premise Cardinal Sean O'Malley would be affirming the strict interpretation of EENS like the religious community in New Hampshire
Her father Brother Francis MICM ( Dr.Fakhri Maluf) was one of the Catholic professors expelled, along with Fr. Leonard Feeney, by Jesuit Boston College, for not interpreting extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with the Fake Premise, as did Pope Pius XII, Archbishop Karol Wojtyla, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and other conservative ecclesiastics.Brother Francis Maluf stayed with the traditional course and affirmed the strict interpretation of EENS, and his daughter does the same.
But the Archdiocese of Boston still expects the daughter of Brother Francis, a religious sister with the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Richmond, New Hampshire, USA to interpret EENS with the Fake Premise, something her father would not do.
Cardinal Sean O'Malley, Archbishop of Boston, does not officially inform the good sister and her family, lay and religious, that Pope Pius XII and subsequent popes made an objective and factual error and that her father was expressing sound and orthodox Catholic doctrine and was expelled for it.
Cardinal O'Malley and the Jesuits need to apologise.
Instead, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the Diocese of Manchester, USA have placed a Decree of Prohibition upon the good sister and other religious at St. Benedict Center, N.H, since they will not use the Fake Premise to interpret EENS and Vatican Council II,and so make a false break with the past Magisterium.
Without the False Premise Cardinal Sean O'Malley would also be affirming the strict interpretation of EENS, like the religious community in New Hampshire.-Lionel Andrades
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2021
The Judiciary in Boston, Massachusetts and New Hampshire could clarify that Lumen Gentium 8 ( elements of sanctification and truth)in other religions leading to salvation, Gaudium et Specs ( being saved with good will) outside the Catholic Church, Unitatis Redintigratio 3( Christians saved in imperfect communion with the Catholic Church without Catholic faith) etc in Vatican Council II do not refer to physically visible cases of human beings in 2021 in the USA. Cardinal Sean O Malley, Boston College and Catholic bishops are not clear on this subject
The Judiciary in Boston, Massachusetts and New Hampshire could clarify that Lumen Gentium 8 ( elements of sanctification and truth)in other religions leading to salvation, Gaudium et Specs ( being saved with good will) outside the Catholic Church, Unitatis Redintigratio 3( Christians saved in imperfect communion with the Catholic Church without Catholic faith) etc in Vatican Council II do not refer to physically visible cases of human beings in 2021 in the USA. Cardinal Sean O Malley, Boston College and Catholic bishops are not clear on this subject. -Lionel Andrades
JULY 16, 2012
BISHOPS OF BOSTON, WORCESTER, MANCHESTER AGREE WE DO NOT KNOW ANY CASE OF SOMEONE SAVED WITH IMPLICIT DESIRE OR INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE: SO THERE IS NO CONTRADICTION OF THE LITERAL INTERPRETATION OF THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 2018
Phil Lawler is orthodox on EENS and Vatican Council II.William Fahey, the TMC President, is irrational, heretical and non Catholic like Cardinal Sean O'Malley and Bishop Peter Anthony Libasci.They are automatically excommunicated for changing the understanding of the Creeds.
LAWLER DOES NOT HAVE TO REJCT EENS OR BOD, BOB AND I.I.
POPE BENEDICT MADE A MISTAKE
NO CHANGE IN THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE CREEDS FOR HIM
DECEMBER 16, 2018
The faculty of the Thomas More College(TMC) of Liberal Arts, N.H, USA is not eligible to teach according to Canon Law since they reject the Syllbus of Errors , Athanasius Creed, past catechisms, original understanding of the Nicene Creed,the dogma EENS and reinterpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition when it is not: Phil Lawler could be an exception.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/the-faculty-of-thomas-more-collegetmc.html
DECEMBER 8, 2018
Thomas More College of Liberal Arts rejects Catholic Tradition by irrationally interpreting Vatican Council II. This has the approval of the two popes, the political Left and the college accreditors :I support Tradition by re-interpreting Vatican Council II rationally
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/thomas-more-college-of-liberal-
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 10, 2020
Diocese of Manchester, USA and CDF grant canonical status for religious communities which interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise, inference and conclusion
1
REPOSTS
DECEMBER 18, 2018
DECEMBER 8, 2018
Thomas More College of Liberal Arts rejects Catholic Tradition by irrationally interpreting Vatican Council II. This has the approval of the two popes, the political Left and the college accreditors :I support Tradition by re-interpreting Vatican Council II rationally
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/thomas-more-college-of-liberal- . 
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment