Monday, March 26, 2018

SSPX cannot use Catholic churches until they accept the heresy and schism of Cardinal Luiz Ladaria and Bishop Charles Morerod

Image result for St.Camillo Lellis Basilica RomeImage result for St.Camillo Lellis Basilica Rome

The priests and members of the Society of St. Pius X would not be allowed to use the Basilica of Saint Camillio, Rome to offer Holy Mass. On Wednesday an ecumenical Way of the Cross has been allowed here.
SSPX CANNOT USE CATHOLIC CHURCHES FOR MASS
Similarly the SSPX cannot offer Holy Mass at Catholic churches in Switzerland.Since they have to interpret Vatican Council II with the LOHO method. It  creates a rupture with the old ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return. This is fine with the Conferences of  Catholics Bishops in Europe and the USA. The SSPX already uses  the LOHO innovation but rejects the conclusion.So they wrongly reject Vatican Council II and are unaware of the LOHO mistake.
If the Society of St. Pius X or the Franciscans of the Immaculate  would announce that they affirm Vatican Council II, without the LOHO reasoning,this would not be acceptable to the popes. The SSPX and F.I would discover that the real issue is not accepting Vatican Council II  but interpreting it as a rupture with Tradition and ignoring the rational choice...1

Even Bishop Charles Morerod o.p would not allow the SSPX to offer Mass at  Cathoic churces in Switzerland and said the reason was doctrinal.


HERESY AS RECTOR AND SECRETARY OF ITC
As Rector of the University of St.Thomas Aquinas(Angelicum), Rome,  he taught that the baptism of desire was an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
As Secretary of the International Theological Commission he made the same error implying that those saved with implicit- for- us salvation are physically visible for them to be exceptions to the dogma.It was explicit for him. He wanted the SSPX to affirm Vatican Council II with all this irrationality.Only then he would consider them doctrinally-correct.Then he would permit them to use Catholic churches for the Sacrifice of Jesus in Holy Mass.2
DOCTRINAL ERROR OF BISHOP MOREROD GOES UNCHECKED
Catholics should really protest against the doctrinal error of Bishop Charles Morerod.It is there in black and white on the Vatican website of the International Theological Commission (ITC).
Bishop Charles Morerod O.P has made an objective error in ITC  papers, when he was the ITC Secretary.The same error he taught at the University of St. Thomas Aquinas when he was the Rector. He also implemented this error as moderator of the thesis of students, who chose the subject, outside the church no salvation.One of them is Fr. Francesco Giordano, the present Director of the Human Life International, Rome Office.. 3
DOGMA EENS SAYS THERE ARE NO EXCEPTIONS MOREROD SAYS THERE ARE
The error of Bishop Morerod,bishop of Geneva, Lausanne and Fribourg,Switzerlamd  is grave. Since it says that a defined dogma EENS  has exceptions when the dogma itself says there are no exceptions.
Irrationally the 'exceptions' for him are non-Catholics  who are dead and are in Heaven, saved with the baptism of desire etc.How can they be exception on earth to EENS? The dogma EENS says all need to be incorporated into the Church as members. Bishop Morerod says this is not true.
This is first class heresy. It contradicts the Nicene Creed,Vatican Council II (AG 7), the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and  magisterial documents  of Pope John Paul II.It contradicts the Bible (John 3:5 , Mark 16:16).
This is an organised denial of Catholic doctrine.Lay  Catholics are then taught that the Church has changed its teachings, even though there has been no new Revelation and no rational new theology.
Bishop Charles Morerod O.P was the  Secretary of the ITC and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J the President of the International Theological Commission (ITC), Vatican.They both were priests at that time and have now been rewarded for their liberalism based on an irrationality.
In their two theological papers they have written that the Catholic Church no more teaches exclusive salvation. Since there can be those saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) etc. So for them there are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.


PROFESSION OF FAITH OR DENIAL OF THE FAITH
When they made their Profession of Faith and took an Oath of Fidelty.They recited the Nicene Constantinople Creed in which we pray ‘I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sin’. However they really meant that not every one on earth needs the baptism of water for salvation. There could be known people saved in invincible ignorance etc. So in actuality there is not one baptism of water for the forgiveness of sin. 
ECCLESIOLOGY BASED ON A FALSE PREMISE AND INFERENCE
Their understanding of the Church is different from that of the Magisterium in the 16th century, for example.Even though in their  Profession of Faith they said ‘ I believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church,' their  understanding of Church, is based on a false inference.
Their understanding of Church (ecclesiology) is that every one on earth does not need to enter the Church for salvation. The holy, catholic and apostolic Church is not necessary for the salvation of all people.The dogma EENS is contrary. Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441 says there are no  exceptions.Every one needs to enter the Church as a member for salvation.
So the Ladaria and Morerod  had made their Profession of Faith denying the traditional teaching of the Church on the necessity of the baptism of water and being incorporated into the Catholic Church to avoid Hell. So their Profession of Faith is really a Denial of the Faith.4
The International Theological Commission theological papers expose the cardinal and bishop’s teaching on visible baptism of desire and their rejection of the dogma and Vatican Council II text.
In the hierarchy of truths we are all obliged to believe in the Creed. In the Nicene Creed we pray ‘I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sin.’ It means the baptism of water is needed for all. All means no known exceptions in the present time.This teaching is Jesus' teaching in John 3:5, Mk.15:15-16.
CANON LAW DOES NOT PERMIT HOLDING OFFICE AND AFFIRMING HERESY IN PUBLIC 
Whatever is one's position on Fr.Leonard Feeney, mentioned by the ITC, objectively we know there are no known cases of the baptism of desire or persons saved in invincible ignorance.So there cannot be a known exception to the dogma.To claim one knows particular exceptions is heresy. It is also irrational.

A Catholic cannot reject in public an ex cathedra dogma and then also hold the office of a cardinal and bishop as in the case of Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Morerod.According to Canon Law priests, bishops and cardinals who hold an office in the Church need to accept those teachings which have to be ‘firmly believed’.(Dominus Iesus).

CDF PREFECT NEEDS TO AFFIRM VATICAN COUNCIL II
Now it is no more a secret to Catholics that it is the CDF Prefect, Cardinal Ladaria, who needs to affirm Vatican Council II(without the false premise), the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was interpreted for centuries(without the baptism of desire referring to known people) and which is in accord with Vatican Council II. A Vatican Council II needs to be affirmed in which Lumen Gentium 16 is not an explicit exception  to the dogma EENS and Ad Gentes 7( all need faith and baptism for salvation).

LADARIA AND MOREROD ARE IN SCHISM WITH PAST POPES
Its unfortunate that the Vatican has announced that the SSPX has to regularise its canonical status by accepting not just Vatican Council II as an historical event (which the SSPX does) but that they need to accept the heretical interpretation of the Vatican team approved by the CDF for secret talks.It is only then that they will be allowed to use Catholic churches for Mass.The doctrinal talks had to be kept secret otherwise Catholics would discover the deception of the Vatican side.
It is really Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Charles Morerod who are in schism with the popes of the past.They are schismatic and heretical.5
CARDINAL LADARIA SUPPORTED A THEOLOGY OF RELIGIONS.
Cardinal Luis Ladaria S.J has removed the Church teaching on  extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Original Sin(with exceptions  in certain cases) , and confusion on Limbo. It was all done with  one objective error: the visibly known case of a non Catholic saved with the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance.
ITC's Christianity and World Religions 1997 postulates that a theology of religions is possible. This is suggested  even though the dogma taught exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church and that all non Catholics are oriented to Hell unless they convert into the Catholic Church.
The Society of St.Pius X are expected to accept all these heresies in the name of Vatican Council II to be able to offer Mass in Catholic churches.6
-Lionel Andrades

1.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/holy-week-in-mortal-sin-is-being.html


2.

FEBRUARY 7, 2013

Bishop Charles Morerod in a doctrinal error says the SSPX cannot use Catholic Churches because of a doctrinal issue
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/02/bishop-charles-morrod-in-doctrinal.html


3.

SEPTEMBER 5, 2012

BISHOP CHARLES MOREROD O.P IN BLATANT HERESY IS TO SPEAK BEFORE THE POPE ON ANGLICAN RELATIONS

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/09/bishop-charles-morerod-op-in-blatant.html
4.
APRIL 20, 2012

Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, Bishop Charles Morerod O.P Oath of Fidelity: to dissent http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/04/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-bishop-charles.html
 5.
APRIL 1, 2012
NO NEED FOR ‘SECRET TALKS’ ANYMORE: WE KNOW THE HERETICAL POSITION OF THE VATICAN NEGOTIATORS http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/04/no-need-for-secret-talks-anymore-we.html
6.      MARCH 31, 2012     Cardinal Luis Ladaria S.J Secretary Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith does away with the defined dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Limbo and Original Sin in the International Theological Commission position papers: CDF expects the Society of St.Pius X to accept all this   http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/03/cardinal-luis-ladaria-sj-secretary.html
______________________________________
WE DO NOT KNOW ANYONE SAVED WITH THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE OR INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE SO EVERYONE NEEDS TO ENTER THE CHURCH AS DON BOSCO TAUGHT- Salesian Rector and Parish priest in Rome http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2011/07/we-do-not-know-anyone-saved-with.html

 VATICAN COUNCIL II AFFIRMS CANTATE DOMINO, COUNCIL OF FLORENCE ON EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS- Fr. Davide Carbonaro http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2011/07/vatican-council-ii-affirms-cantate.html
Its a mortal sin to deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. It is a sacrilege to receive the Eucharist in this condition- Fr. Gabrielle, priest of the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2011/07/its-mortal-sin-to-deny-dogma-extra.html#links

 THERE IS NO BAPTISM OF DESIRE THAT WE CAN KNOW OF- Fr.George Puthoor
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2011/06/there-is-no-baptism-of-desire-that-we.html#links

 FR.TULLIO ROTONDO AFFIRMS CANTATE DOMINO, COUNCIL OF FLORENCE ON EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2011/08/frtullio-rotondo-affirms-cantate-domino.html#links
CANTATE DOMINO, COUNCIL OF FLORENCE ON EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS IS DE FIDE AND NOT CONTRADICTED BY VATICAN COUNCIL II- Fr. Nevus Marcello O.P
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2011/07/cantate-domino-council-of-florence-on.html

 BRAZILIAN PRIEST SAYS VATICAN COUNCIL II DOES NOT CONTRADICT DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUShttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2011/07/brazilian-priest-says-vatican-council.html#links

 CATHOLIC PRIESTS IN ROME AGREE WITH FR.LEONARD FEENEY: THERE IS NO BAPTISM OF DESIRE THAT WE CAN KNOW OF
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2011/08/catholic-priests-in-rome-agree-with.html#links
____________________________

FEBRUARY 6, 2013
Traditionalists not welcome in Catholic churches: they first have to accept the doctrine of the dead-saved are physically visible to us and then adapt this new doctrine to Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/02/traditionalists-not-welcome-in-catholic.html
SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 2013
SSPX SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO USE THE BASILICAS IN ROME FOR HOLY MASS


Progressivists interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise of 'implicit desire being visible' or 'the dead are visible' and then assume that they accept Vatican Council II.
JUNE 21, 2011
ANGELICUM UNIVERSITY RECTOR REJECTS CHURCH TEACHING ON EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS REPRESENTED THE VATICAN AT FAILED TALKS WITH THE SSPX
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2011/06/angelicum-university-rector-rejects.html
OCTOBER 25, 2011
HUTTON AND MEL GIBSON NOT CONTRADICTED BY VATICAN COUNCIL II ON EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2011/10/hutton-and-mel-gibson-not-contradicted.html
JUNE 28, 2013
The conference on the liturgy needs to discuss the case of Bishop Charles Morerod O.P who basis his errors on Vatican Council II and offers Holy Mass http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/06/the-conference-on-liturgy-needs-to.html
JUNE 27, 2013
Conference on Sacred Liturgy: How can Bishop Charles Morerod O.P be allowed to offer Holy Mass ? http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/06/conference-on-sacred-liturgy-how-can.html
MARCH 31, 2012
Cardinal Luis Ladaria S.J Secretary Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith does away with the defined dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Limbo and Original Sin in the International Theological Commission position papers: CDF expects the Society of St.Pius X to accept all this 
____________________________

Posted by at
Labels: , ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)