Vatican Council II does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus irrespective of your opinion on Fr.Leonard Feeney

from the blog Introibo Ad Altare Dei

Summary and Conclusion

Rarely does heresy stay isolated. Those who deny Catholic teaching on BOD and BOB hold up as a modern day "savior" the late Jesuit, Fr. Leonard Feeney. This is a priest who:

• was never qualified as a theologian or canonist  

• was disobedient to his lawful superiors and refused to report to the Holy See during the reign of Pope Pius XII and defend his teachings. He was subsequently excommunicated by Pope Pius XII. 

• taught a strange, mixed-up notion of Justification and Salvation which is rejected even by his modern day followers

• started a "religious order" consisting of married couples with children without ecclesiastical approval and in violation of Canon Law

• abused the children of those "religious" by raising them communally and depriving them of their mother and father as God intended

• taught that baptized infants were not somehow in the Mystical Body of Christ and could not be considered "children of Mary"

• sought and received reconciliation in the false Vatican II sect which will accept ANY teaching as long as it isn't the teaching of the One True Church. 

But still the bottom line is that Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

These are all opinions above.

The fact is that there are no practical exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in 2016-2018.

So whatever is the blogger's opinion about Fr. Leonard Feeney, Vatican Council II does not contradict the 'strict interpretation' of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

 After reading the title of this post, you might be thinking, "Not another discussion of Baptism of Desire (BOD) and Baptism of Blood (BOB)." Not to worry, it's not really going to be a discussion of that topic, but a related matter. Most people may not be aware that heresy is rarely ever limited to one topic. Deny one doctrine of the Faith, and you fall away completely from the Church and God's protection from error. The so-called "Boston Heresy" case involving Fr. Leonard Feeney is a perfect example.

Whatever is your opinion on the Boston Heresy case, Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the Church Fathers, the Medieval Church Fathers, the Jesuits in the Middle Ages and Fr. Leonard Feeney .

No one can cite an exception in Vatican Council II to Feeneyite EENS.

Try it.

LG 8. We do not know any one in 2016-2018 who has been saved outside the Catholic Church where the true Church of Christ subsists.

We do not know any one outside the Catholic Church who has been saved with elements of sanctification and truth outside the Church.There are no such cases known to us. There  can be no practical exceptions for us human beings.

So hold whatever position you would want to on Fr. Leonard Feeney but know that Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the dogma EENS as it was known to Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Center of his time.

Fr. Feeney died "reconciled" to the false Vatican II sect under Paul VI (Montini). He was never made to recant his errors. This "hero" of the dogma Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus refused to acknowledge that BOD and BOB are part of that very same dogma! 

So inspite of this opinion and so many others among traditionalists and sedevacantists we are still left with the fact that Vatican Council II does not contradict the 'strict interpretation' of the dogma EENS. There is nothing in the Council for it to be a development with reference to EENS.-Lionel Andrades

Vatican Council II does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus - whatever may be your view of Pope Pius XII and Fr.Leonard Feeney  

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/message-incomplete-things-are-really-bad.html