Vatican Council II is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesia nulla salus(EENS) as Fr. Leonard Feeney understood it.

Fr Hunwicke's Mutual Enrichment

From Fr.Hunwicke's blog.

Readers with good memories may remember the tragic figure of the Boston priest Fr Leonard Feeney, who in 1949, did get himself condemned by the Holy Office for a similar heresy involving just this sort of attempt to be more traditionalist than Tradition. He maintained, citing the bull Unam sanctam, that no one would be saved who was not in full visible communion with the Catholic Church ... no nonsense about 'invincible ignorance' or anything like that. He refused to submit himself to what the Magisterium - in the person of Pius XII - actually taught on this point, and eventually incarnated his own paradox by being excommunicated.

But Vatican Council II is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesia nulla salus(EENS) as Fr. Leonard Feeney understood it.

For Fr.Leonard Feeney every one needed to enter the Church as members and there were no exceptions.

So where are the exceptions to Feeneyite EENS in Vatican Council II today? There are none.

Lumen Gentium 16 mentions invincible ignorance.

It also mentions a good conscience.

So where are the non Catholics saved in 2009-2018 outside the Church in invincible ignorance or a good conscience ?

Where are the practical exceptions to Fr. Leonard Feeney?

There are none. 

So whatever is Fr.Hunwicke's opinion on Fr. Leonard Feeney there are no known exceptions to the past exclusivist ecclesiology. There are no exceptions to the pre-Vatican Council II, 'triumphalism'. There are no exceptions in Vatican Council II to the past ecclesiology for me, after Vatican Council II.

This is the staggering fact which is being overlooked by every one. Vatican Council II is pro-Fr.Leonard Feeney, pro-Tradition.-Lionel Andrades

http://liturgicalnotes.blogspot.com/2009/12/more-traditionalist-than-tradition.html