SSPX Mass has an impediment : rupture with EENS, Nicene Creed and Catechisms as they were interpreted in the 16th century at Mass is sacrilege

Tomorrow Sunday the SSPX bishops and priests will offer the Tridentine Rite Mass while interpreting the  baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) with irrational Cushingism, instead of Feeneyism.So with this irrationality Magisterial documents will come across as being heretical.

They interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism. They reject the Council(Cushingite) but do not interpret it with Feeneyism.

I affirm BOD,BOB and I.I with Feeneyism. I also affirm Vatican Council II with Feeneyism. I follow Tradition.

The SSPX interprets the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with Cushingism. I use traditional Feeneyite philosophy.For me EENS is Feeneyite .So they reject the original interpretation of EENS. Again this is heresy. This is a mortal sin of faith.

This is an impediment to offering Holy Mass.

I mentioned in a previous blog post that on the  SSPX offical website BOD, BOB and I.I being explicit, become exceptions to the dogma EENS ( Feeneyite).They become objective examples of non Catholics saved outside the Church. For me BOD,BOB and I.I being implicit are not an exception or relevant to EENS ( Feeneyite).

Since BOD, BOB and I.I are implicit, as are LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) is not a rupture with EENS ( Feeneyite) for me.The SSPX does not seem to have any concept of Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).

Since BOD, BOB and I.I refer to explicit non Catholics saved outside the Church, without the baptism of water, there are now two interpretations of the Nicene Creed.There's and mine. One is Cushingite and the other Feeneyite. For them it is ,'I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins and they exclude the baptism of water, they are the baptisms of desire,blood, invincible ignorance etc'.For me it is 'I believe in one(known) baptism for the forgiveness of sins'. Their understanding of the Creed is heretical.

They interpret all the Catechisms with Cushingism and I do so with Feeneyism. So the Catechisms must be an exception to EENS ( Feeneyite) and the past exclusivist ecclesiology for them. Not for me.

So when the Catechism of Pope Pius X mentions invincible ignorance, for example,  the SSPX bishop and priest reads it with Cushingism.. The Catechism of Pope Pius X would then contradict Feeneyite EENS, the Syllabus of Errors( Feeneyite) and the past excluvist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.

This is not Catholic doctrine and theology. Yet their will offer Holy Mass tomorrow in this condition.

Since BOD, BOB and I.I and UR 3 refer to objective non Catholics saved outside the Church, Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with an ecumenism of return. Also BOD, BOB and I.I becomes a rupture with Feeneyite EENS on ecumenism.

In general the SSPX interprets Magisterial documents as a rupture with Tradition( EENS, Syllabus of Errors) unlike me and yet they keep saying that they follow Tradition.This is false.

Is not the Mass which they offer sacrilegious ?

It is a rupture with EENS as it was known in the 16th century at Mass.

It is a rupture with the Nicene Creed as it was known in the 16th century.

It is a rupture with the Catechisms as they were known in the 16th century....

--Lionel Andrades