Repost : Priors at the St.Benedict Centers will not affirm Feeneyite Vatican Council II opposed by their bishops.They continue to support Vatican Council II(Cushingite) which is a rupture with EENS(Feeneyite)

DECEMBER 19, 2017

Priors at the St.Benedict Centers will not affirm Feeneyite Vatican Council II opposed by their bishops.They continue to support Vatican Council II(Cushingite) which is a rupture with EENS(Feeneyite)

The Priors at the St.Benedict Centers will not affirm Feeneyite Vatican Council II since it could get them into trouble.They continue to support Vatican Council II(Cushingite) like their bishops.It is an interpretation which contradicts extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) as it was known to Fr.Leonard Feeney and Catherine Goddard Clarke. 

Ecclesia Dei and the bishops of Worcester and Manchester,USA have no objections to the St. Benedict Centers( SBC) affirming  the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS as long as they accept Vatican Council II(Cushingite).Vatican Council II(Cushingite) is a rupture with Tradition.It is a break with the old exclusivist ecclesiology and Feeneyite EENS.So in reality, like the SSPX, the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Centers are affirming an EENS(Cushingite).

Here there is no objection from Ecclesia Dei.The St. Benedict Centers, the communities of Fr. Leonard Feeney can now receive canonical recognition.

They interpret Lumen Gentium 16(inculpableignorance) as does Wikipedia (See  extra ecclesiam nulla salus).

The Catholic Church also teaches that the doctrine does not mean that everyone who is not visibly within the Church is necessarily damned in case of inculpable ignorance.-Wikipedia

So having accepted Vatican Council II and now recognized as Priors at the St. Benedict Centers, their message is that Lumen Gentium 16(inculpable ignorance) is an exception to the dogma EENS, as it is also understood by Wikipedia.This is acceptable for Ecclesia Dei and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

So the SBC will say that they affirm EENS according to Fr. Leonard Feeney or the missionaries in the 16th century and then simultaneously they will negate this statement by admitting that they know only Vatican Council II(Cushingite).Of course it theologically negates EENS(Feeneyite).

So Brothers Thomas Augustine and Andre Marie,MICM, Priors, at the St.Benedict Centers in the diocese Worcester and Manchester,USA affirm the strict interpretation of Vatican Council II and also contradict it with Cushingite EENS, like Wikipedia and the present magisterium.

Brother Thomas Augustine MICM, whose community at Still RIver was recently granted canonical recognition by Bishop Robert McMahon, the bishop of Worcester is not affirming Vatican Council II(Feeneyite).Since then it would mean that Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the strict interpretation of EENS.The Council has to be a rupture with EENS for the magisterium.So the bishop and his Curia in Worcester do not affirm the strict interpretation of EENS.If they did it would mean Vatican Council II(AG 7)  says all need faith and baptism for salvation(Jews, Muslims etc) and LG 16 is not a known exception to EENS.It would negate Wikipedia too. So the diocese would have returned to the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.This will not be acceptable to the Jewish Left.They would demand that the priors be suspended or the communities de-regularised.

So Brothers Thomas Augustine and Andre Marie will not interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with Feeneyite EENS since it would not be politically correct.They will not continue to get the recognition they presently have from their bishops.

I have been reporting on this for quite some time and there is no denial from them.

How can they issue a denial ? How can they say that I am wrong and that they really affirm Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) which is in harmony with the old ecclesiology of the Church ? The old ecclesiology was the basis for the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the understanding of mission according to the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.There would be protests from at least the German and English bishops.The bishops in Worcester and Manchester would be criticized by the liberal USCCB. This could be the end of the understanding the priors and their good communities have built with their bishops over the last few years.So the priors keep silent.-Lionel Andrades

DECEMBER 18, 2017

Bishop Thomas Augustine MICM, and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Still River,MA have compromised on Vatican Council II and EENS

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/bishop-thomas-augustine-micm-and-slaves.html

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/12/priors-at-stbenedict-centers-will-not.html