Catholics avoiding the Anti Semitism charge

I am not a traditionalist who simply cites the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and rejects Vatican Council II.Instead I affirm exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church based on Vatican Council II which does not contradict the dogma EENS for me. 

Unlike Pope Benedict and Cardinal Malcolm Ranjit I affirm the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. Since LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to only hypothetical cases for me. They can only be speculative possibilities in 2019. They are not personally known people saved outside the Church.

So I affirm the Catechism of the Catholic Church( 846-Outside the Church No Salvation) which cites Ad Gentes 7( all need faith and baptism for salvation) and I know that the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) are not exceptions.This is obvious for all. It is common knowledge.

Similarly for me the saints Augustine and Aquinas, affirmed the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS and BOD, BOB and I.I were not exceptions.They were hypothetical and invisible cases for them too.

Also for Fr.Leonard Feeney of Boston there were no literal cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I  but the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 assumed that BOD,BOB and I.I  were objective exceptions to EENS.

May be they had a political agenda to follow at that time. This was about the  time of the creation of Israel.They were probably told that they had to get rid of the dogma EENS.The only way they could do it was by saying that BOD, BOB and I.I were objective exceptions to EENS. This was irrational,non traditional and heretical.The popes, who did not have an army or political power like their enemies, repeated the error in Vatican Council II.
   

So the first part of the Letter of the Holy Office (LOHO) affirms traditional EENS and the second part of LOHO, for me, does not contradict the first part, which is orthodox on salvation.In the second half the references to BOD,BOB and I.I are to invisible cases.
So I do not reject LOHO. I simply re-interpret it rationally and traditionally.

This is the teaching of the Church which is being ignored for political reasons.

For ideological reasons Mother Angelica was forced to leave EWTN and now for ideological reasons the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire, USA is being decreed as being legally not Catholic - even though they affirm Vatican Council II and EENS in harmony with Tradition.While, the present two popes and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) do not do this.

Mother Angelica was being forced to interpret LOHO; Vatican Council II and  the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally. So a break with EENS and the Syllabus of Errors had to be created.

They took control  of EWTN. The USCCB bishops until today interpret LOHO,Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally. They also interpret BOD, BOB and I.I using the same irrational premise to create a non traditional conclusion and inference.

Mahony appeals to Rome about Angelica

By JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
NCR Staff

Cardinal Roger Mahony of Los Angeles has taken his complaints about Mother Angelica and her cable television network EWTN to the Vatican, according to the cardinal’s spokesperson. Sources close to Mahony say he intends to demand fundamental changes in both the management style and the on-air tone of the controversial Catholic media outlet.

“The cardinal wants the Holy See to do something about Mother Angelica’s whole attitude that she is not responsible to the National Conference of Catholic Bishops or to any of the individual bishops,” said Capuchin Fr. Gregory Coiro, director of media relations for the Los Angeles archdiocese. “It goes beyond her criticism of the cardinal -- it’s about how the network operates and to whom it is accountable,” he said.

While Mahony was in Rome for the recent Synod for America, Coiro said, he approached the Congregation for the Institutes of Consecrated Life and the Societies of Apostolic Life, under the direction of Cardinal Eduardo Martínez Somalo, and the Pontifical Council for Social Communications under American Archbishop John Foley. In both cases, Coiro said, Mahony discussed EWTN and the changes he thinks are necessary.  1

 Cardinal Mahoney met a group of liberal rabbis and told them that the Church does not expect them to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation.Cardinal Sean O'Malley said the same on the website of the Archdiocese of Boston.

Pope Benedict recently clarified for a German theologian that Jews do not need to convert for salvation.So he was not Anti-Semitic.His Vicar General in Rome, Cardinal Bagnasco, officially announced for the Vicariate that Jews do not need to convert. He made this announcement in the presence of the rabbis Segno and Lara.

This is all a rejection of Vatican Council II, the Catechism and LOHO interpreted rationally.

During the flap over the Good Friday Prayer for the Conversion of the Jews, the Italian daily, Il Messaggero, reported that there was threat of war from Israel.So Pope Benedict announced that the Jews do not need to convert in the present times.

Rabbis Segno and Lara visited the Vatican offices and the Urbaniana Pontifical University and called for an end to mission.This was reported in the daily Avvenire.The Rector of the Urbaniana University had to meet members of the B'nai Brit.

The  Lodges are telling the Catholic Church what theology was acceptable for them. Satan was telling Christ's Church to change its teachings on mission and salvation.

Even the traditionalists unknowingly agree with them.So they interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture  with EENS.For themn there are personally known cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I in 2019.

This is the official position of the SSPX and that of the sedevacantist Bishop Donald Sanborn at his seminary in Florida.So there are no  Anti-Semitic charges brought against them.It is the same with the professors of the Sacred Heart Major Seminary in Detroit, USA.

We now have two popes who have saved their life and protected the Vatican in its present form who choose not to be martyrs.It is the same with the traditionalists who have protected their life and organizations like Remnant News, Lepanto Institute, Latin Mass Societies, Una Voce, Fatima Center etc. It is the same with traditionalist bloggers who are concerned only when the pope does not affirm Church doctrine. This summer they will have more of the same conferences which will avoid the Anti-Semitic charge by changing doctrine and theology like the liberals.

-Lionel Andrades

1

 http://natcath.org/NCR_Online/archives2/1998a/013098/mahony.htm