March 13, 2018
Fr.John Zuhlsdorf interprets magisterial documents including Vatican Council II with Cushingism, the right hand side column, which depends on an irrational premise to create a non traditional conclusion : pot calls the kettle black
OCTOBER 1, 2015
Fr.John Zuhlsdorf is in material heresy
Fr.John Zuhlsdorf recently wrote that the SSPX could be in material/ de iure schism and that their canonical position is 'ambigous'. He mentions ' the gravity of the material schism by which souls are at grave risk of not being saved for as long as the situation perdures.'.
Fr.John Zuhlsdorf recently wrote that the SSPX could be in material/ de iure schism and that their canonical position is 'ambigous'. He mentions ' the gravity of the material schism by which souls are at grave risk of not being saved for as long as the situation perdures.'.
Yes
the SSPX would be in material schism for rejecting Vatican Council
II if the criteria for the interpretation of the Council is Cushingism, the irrational premise and inference and the right hand column.(Pl.see tags for a definition of these terms)
If the irrational premise and inference was avoided, and if Feeneyism and the left hand column were used
in the interpretation of Vatican Council II then Pope John Paul II,
Pope Benedict XVI, Pope Francis and Fr. John Zuhlsdorf would be in
material schism.They would be interpreting Vatican Council II as a break
with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). This is material schism with the past popes.The pot has been calling the kettle black.
I Lionel, affirm Vatican Council II interpreted without the irrational premise and inference and with Feeneyism and the left hand side column.
At the centre of Fr. Zuhlsdorf and my interpretation of Vatican Council II is EENS.He does not realize this.
For
Fr.Z the popes cannot be in heresy since he cannot conceive, perhaps,
of magisterial heresy among the contemporary popes ( from Pius XII to
Francis).
For
me the contemporary Magisterium uses fantasy theology which is a break
with the pre-1949 magisterium.So the Magisterium has to be wrong either
before or after 1949.Any one who infers we can see and know people in
Heaven in 2015 as we see and know people on earth has to be wrog. If a
pope or cardinal implies this he is still wrong.
The
SSPX says they affirm the perennial Magisterium of the Catholic Church.
The perennial Magisterium ( before 1949) did not interpret the dogma
EENS with Cushingism.
1.They did not assume salvation in Heaven is visible and known on earth for us human beings.
2. They did not assume that these 'visible cases' exclude the baptism of water.
3.They
did not infer that these allegedly visible cases were explicit
exceptions to all needing to be formal members of the Church with 'faith
and baptism' for salvation.
For Fr.John Zuhlsdorf and the present Magisterium all these three errors ( 1,2,3) are there in their theology.
It is their position on Vatican Council II which is ambigous because of this irrationality of which they are not aware of.
For the SSPX and for them, there would be no ambiguity if they interpreted all magisterial documents without irrational Cushingism and without the false premise and inference which creates a new theology.
There is no ambiguity then in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.
The ambiguity comes with Cushingism which is a new theology based on the irrationality
of being able to see and know of non Catholics now in Heaven who are
there without the baptism of water and Catholic Faith( the premise) and
who are exceptions to the strict interpretation of EENS ( the false
inference).So all do not need to convert into the Church in the present
times ( is the false conclusion).
I have
written about this in the past. Quite a few times and I have e-mailed
and tweeted this to Fr.Z. He could comment on his schism with the past
popes on EENS ' the gravity of the material schism (heresy) by which
souls are at grave risk of not being saved for as long as the situation
perdures.'.-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/03/frjohn-zuhlsdorf-interprets-magisterial.html
No comments:
Post a Comment