Declaration of Truths signatories support the New Theology and New Ecclesiology which is based upon an irrationality and its conclusion is non traditional and heretical

 

A Declaration of Truths has been issued by cardinals and bishops on Pentecost Monday which does not state that outside the Catholic Church there is no known salvation; there are no practical exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the past exclusive ecclesiology and an ecumenisn of return. So all non Catholics and non Christians are oriented to Hell in general unless they enter the Catholic Church with 'faith and baptism'.( Cantate Dominio, Council of Florence 1441, Vatican Council II (AG 7), Catechism of Pope Pius X etc). This needs to be affirmed.

 The ambiguity still exists in the Declaration. Since, for the signatories unknown cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are personally known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So a rupture emerges with EENS as it was known, for example, to the Magisterium in the 16th century.

The ambiguity also exists since the signatories have not stated that invisible and hypothetical cases referenced in Vatican Council II (LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc) are not physically visible non Catholics, saved outside the Church in 1965-2019.So Vatican Council II would not contradict the traditional, Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS.On the contrary they are using the false premise like the ecclesiastics at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Vatican.

For the signatories unknown cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2 etc are objective and practical examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church. So they are exceptions to the traditional understanding of there being no salvation outside the Church.

This is a rejection of the dogma EENS and  a rejection of the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation.This creates a new understanding of the Nicene and Apostles Creed.There emerges  an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, which makes the Council a rupture with the Creeds and Catechisms.

This is first class heresy.

It is also the common irrational interpretation of magisterial documents with the familiar false premise and inference which creates a new non traditional conclusion.

The Declaration has accommodated the New Theology, in faith and salvation. So with there being alleged known cases of non- Catholics being saved outside the Church for the signatories, they were restricted to a Christology which excludes an ecclesiocentric ecclesiology.It is Jesus without the necessity of formal membership in the Catholic Church for salvation.

The signatories are supporting the New Ecclesiology based upon hypothetical and theoretical cases, for us human beings, being personally visible people saved outside the Church in the present times.This is a violation of the Principle of Non Contradiction. We cannot see someone on earth who is also in Heaven, saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.The person would have to be in two places at the same time.How can any one of us say that a St. Emerentiana or St. Victor is in Heaven without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church?
Upon the common irrationality a new theology and ecclesiology is supported by the signatories and this would be welcome to the present two popes and the liberals.-Lionel Andrades

 https://www.lifesitenews.com/images/local/Declaration_Truths_Errors.pdf
 https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/cdl-burke-bp-schneider-issue-declaration-of-truths-to-correct-rampant-doctrinal-confusion-in-church