Repost : Why do I call it the Lionel Andrades model? Since I am the only one working on this.No one else on earth has discussed what precisely creates the hermeneutic of rupture with Vatican Council II.They all agree that Vatican Council II has a hermeneutic of rupture but they did not know the precise cause.

SEPTEMBER 10, 2018

Why do I call it the Lionel Andrades model? Since I am the only one working on this.No one else on earth has discussed what precisely creates the hermeneutic of rupture with Vatican Council II.They all agree that Vatican Council II has a hermeneutic of rupture but they did not know the precise cause.

Why do I call it the Lionel Andrades model? Since I am the only one working on this.

No one else on earth has discussed what precisely creates  the hermeneutic of rupture with Vatican Council II.They all agree that Vatican Council II has a hermeneutic of rupture but they did not know the precise cause.

The precise cause is interpreting the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance as referring to known and objectively seen people, non Catholics, saved outside the Catholic Church.This was the mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.

Then the same irrational theology was repeated at Vatican Council II.
Lumen Gentium 8, Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16, Unitatis Redintigratio 2, Nostra Aetate 2, Gaudium et Specs 22 etc do not refer to non Catholics whom we can meet in 2018, who are saved outside the Church, without 'faith and baptism'.
I avoid these errors and so there is no rupture with Tradition and we do not have to reject Vatican Council II.
-Lionel Andrades

SEPTEMBER 10, 2018

Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church have a hermeneutic of continuity with the past exclusivist ecclesiology and Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) only when interpreted with what I call the Lionel Andrades model

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/vatican-council-ii-and-catechism-of.html

SEPTEMBER 10, 2018

So now we can interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with the 'strict interpretation' of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and without the hermeneutic of rupture. This is the Lionel Andrades model

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/so-now-we-can-interpret-vatican-council.html

 SEPTEMBER 8, 2018

Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct and Pope Pius XII and the Archbishop of Boston, Cardinal Cushing were wrong.Literally there are no baptism of desire cases.Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj was wrong at the Placuet Deo Press Conference. Literally there are no known cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/frleonard-feeney-was-correct-and-pope.html

SEPTEMBER 7, 2018

Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston was orthodox and the popes and the present Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith are in heresy. Quite a thing to say ! I know     http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/fr-leonard-feeney-of-boston-is-orthodox.html

• Lionel Andrades' Catholic beliefs (7)
• Lionel Andrades' description of Feeneyism and Cushingism (4)
• Lionel Andrades' intepretation of Vatican Council II and Extra ecclesiam nulla salus (4)
• Lionel Andrades' interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS (6)

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/why-do-i-call-it-lionel-andrades-model.html