Bishop Peter Libasci considers invincible ignorance as referring to personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church, while Brother Andre Marie MICM, sees them as only being hypothetical cases. This is the big difference between the two of them in the diocese of Manchester, USA.

Bishop Peter Libasci considers invincible ignorance as referring to personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church, while Brother Andre Marie MICM, sees them as only being hypothetical cases. This is the big difference between the two of them in the diocese of Manchester, USA.

The bishop has to assume that invincible ignorance refers to literally known people, otherwise, there would be no exceptions to EENS. He would be holding the Feeneyite traditional understanding of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

It is because of the Feeneyite, old understanding of EENS that he is being asked to persecute the St. Benedict Center .So he is not allowed to say that invincible; a person in invincible ignorance through no fault of his own(LG 14 etc), refers to theoretical and speculative cases for us human beings in 2019.

The diocese, Director of Education Ms. Mary Ellen Mahon and the Catechists, who attend Holy Mass in English,  would side with Brother Andre Marie. Obviously, there are no visible exceptions to EENS in 2019.

However since the Vatican and the Left support the bishop, he continues with the false narrative on EENS, Vatican Council II, Creeds and Catechisms.This is a mortal sin of faith.It is another religion.

This is also the false reasoning and new theology of the FSSP priests in the diocese of Manchester.They  offer the Latin Mass with the New Ecclesiology.They are in a rupture with the Magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century.In the 16th centurythey offered the Tridentine Rite Mass, with the old Feeneyite ecclesiology of Church.

-Lionel Andrades