When Pope Francis returned from Abu Dhabi he said he had not shifted from Vatican Council II.His concept of Vatican Council II was Cushingite and no fault was found with him on this point by Cardinal Burke and Bishop Schneider , since they too are Cushingites.
They both interpret Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with Cushingism.
If Pope Francis interpreted Vatican Council II with Feeneyism, he would be saying the Council does not contradict Feeneyite EENS and neither the past ecclesiology.So theologically there can only be an ecumenism of return.There is no option for the New Ecumenism.
However today his theology is Cushingite so there is known salvation outside the Church for him, outside the Church there is salvation today and the dogma EENS is contradicted and made obsolete.
If Pope Francis and the CDF interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism the USCCB and European bishops conferences will blow their top.There could be general disobedience to the truth, from the Left.
It would mean to be legally a Catholic in the diocese of Manchester, USA ,Bishop Peter Libasci and his Curia would have to switch to Feeneyite Vatican Council II, with LG 8 etc referring to hypothetical and not objective cases in the present times.They would then be Feeneyite on EENS.
It would mean having to admit that in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case, the Jesuit priest was orthodox and rational and Cardinal Cushing and the bishops and cardinals at the Holy Office (CDF), were irrational and heretical.They wrongly suggested invisible cases were personally visible examples of salvation outside the Church and the dogma EENS, defined by three Church Councils, had to be rejected.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment