John Henry Weston and John Smeaton are not announcing that the baptism of desire (BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) refer to only hypothetical cases and are not real people known in 2019 saved outside the Catholic Church.
If they would make this announcement their interpretation of magisterial documents would change.
It would also mean Vatican Council II is traditional. It is not a rupture with the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.
So Vatican Council II would not be a basis for calling for a change in ecclesiology and theology in the Church, a claim made by Pope Francis and which is not known to Weston and Smeaton, and the organizers of the Round table Discussion on the Eve of the Amazon Synod.
The Amazon Synod is based upon the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Cushingism and Pope Francis calls this 'the spirit of Vatican Council II'. It is a heretical interpretation.Meanwhile the pope is not affirming Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and neither are the participants of the round table discussion.
Yet they are demanding that the Amazon synod not change the teachings of the Church, when they accept the new eccelsiology based upon Vatican Council II, Cushingite. While they do not affirm the old exclusivist ecclesiology, based upon Vatican Council II, Feeneyite.
Some of the participants at the round table discussion reject Vatican Council II and others accept it. All interpret Vatican Council II with only Cushingism.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment