Then Michael Matt who rejects Vatican Council II is also at the same table.
Neither of the two make a distinction between Vatican Council II Cushingite and Vatican Council II Feeneyite and extra ecclesiam nulla salus Cushingite and Feeneyite.
Both of them interpret the baptism of desire,baptism of blood and invincible ignorance with Cushingism, so there has to be a rupture with Tradition.
They do not known that their hermeneutic of rupture created by Vatican Council II, is really caused with their Cushingite reasoning.The Council is traditional.
Pope Francis justifies changes in Church teaching by citing Vatican Council II Cushingite and no one corrects him on this point.
-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment