The Roundtable Discussion on the Eve of the Pan Amazon Synod organised by the Voice of the Family has schismatic participants.They interpret Vatican Council II with heretical and irrational Cushingism.

 

The Roundtable Discussion on the Eve of the Pan Amazon Synod organised by the Voice of the Family has schismatic participants.They interpret Vatican Council II with heretical and irrational Cushingism. Then they accept  the Council like the past popes since Pius VI.They reject Vatican Council II (Feeneyite), like the liberals.So they are in a  theological and doctrinal rupture with the popes and Church Councils.

The popes before Pius XII  affirmed the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) but also mentioned hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) which were not practical exceptions to EENS, for them.

But the participants at the Roundtable discussion, like Pope Paul VI and Pope Francis, interpret BOD, BOB and I.I  as being non hypothetical  exceptions to EENS. I call this Cushingism. Pope Paul VI was Cushingite but the popes before Pope Pius XII were Feeneyite. They interpreted BOD, BOB and I.I as only being hypothetical, theoretical and speculative.They could not be practical and objective.This was how God made it.

Cushingism is an innovation.It was brought into the Church by the liberal theologians.It is irrational.It creates the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. This was not known to Archbishop Lefebvre, and the traditionalists of his time, including Prof. Roberto dei Mattei, one of the participants in the discussion.He has written books on Vatican Council II based upon Cushingism.

So now like the present two popes, the discussion panel, with Cushingites,are in schism with the past popes on EENS and BOD, BOB and I.I. The result : they interpret the Creeds and Catechisms, in a rupture with Tradition.-Lionel Andrades