Cardinals Hummes, Baldiserri,Ladaria and others at the Amazon Synod must be told that Vatican Council II is being interpreted on the blog Eucharist and Mission(Lionel's Blog) as having an ecclesiocentric ecclesiology which negates their 'only Christological' interpretation of the Council.
Their interpretation of the Council is heretical since it is a rupture with the Athanasius Creed ( outside the Church no salvation), the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Council of Florence 1441 etc),the Catechism of Pope Pius X( no salvation outside the Church) etc.
With the Council interpreted as having an exclusivist ecclesiology,by a Catholic layman in Rome, they come across clearly as being heretical and with the hermeneutic of rupture with the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.They are also in a break with the Syllabus of Errors. All the Creeds are interpreted irrationally.This is schism with the past popes.
Lumen Gentium does not contradict the past ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.
The Council, Catechisms and Creeds are interpreted with Feeneyism( hypothetical cases are only hypothetical) and without irrational Cushingism of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(hypothetical cases are objective people in 2019).
So when the Working Paper of the Amazon Synod denies exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church it is a heretical theology based upon an objective mistake.
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) and the Jesuits need to clarify that their counterparts made an objective mistake in 1949 when the Letter of the Holy Office(LOHO) to the Archbishop of Boston was made public.The LOHO assumes unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are personally known and objective examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church- and so exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).The Jesuits supported the LOHO and expelled Fr. Leonard Feeney from their community.The Holy Office(CDF) and the Jesuits were interpreting BOD, BOB and I.I irrationally and projecting them as exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.
They were not interpreting BOD, BOB and I.I like I do.
The Coetus Internationalis Patrum Working Group (International Group of Fathers) could comment on these blog posts which interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Feeneyism instead of the common Cushingism.The CDF and the Jesuits need to admit that there was a mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case. They need to apologise. -Lionel Andrades
Lumen Gentium does not contradict the past ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.
The Council, Catechisms and Creeds are interpreted with Feeneyism( hypothetical cases are only hypothetical) and without irrational Cushingism of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(hypothetical cases are objective people in 2019).
So when the Working Paper of the Amazon Synod denies exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church it is a heretical theology based upon an objective mistake.
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) and the Jesuits need to clarify that their counterparts made an objective mistake in 1949 when the Letter of the Holy Office(LOHO) to the Archbishop of Boston was made public.The LOHO assumes unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are personally known and objective examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church- and so exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).The Jesuits supported the LOHO and expelled Fr. Leonard Feeney from their community.The Holy Office(CDF) and the Jesuits were interpreting BOD, BOB and I.I irrationally and projecting them as exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.
They were not interpreting BOD, BOB and I.I like I do.
The Coetus Internationalis Patrum Working Group (International Group of Fathers) could comment on these blog posts which interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Feeneyism instead of the common Cushingism.The CDF and the Jesuits need to admit that there was a mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case. They need to apologise. -Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment