Vatican Council II is not only Christological it is ecclesiocentric when Lumen Gentium does not contradict the past exclusivist ecclesiology, Ad Gentes does not contradict traditional mission and exclusive salvation, there being no known exceptions and Unitatitis Redintigratio does not contradict the centuries old ecumenism of return.Nostra Aetate does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which states all need faith and baptism for salvation and there is nothing in Dignitatis Redintigratio to oppose the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in a Catholic State.

Vatican Council II is not only Christological  it is ecclesiocentric when Lumen Gentium does not contradict the past exclusivist ecclesiology, Ad Gentes  does not contradict traditional mission and exclusive salvation, there being no known exceptions and Unitatitis Redintigratio does not contradict the centuries old ecumenism of return.Nostra Aetate does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which states all need faith and baptism for salvation and there  is nothing in Dignitatis Redintigratio  to oppose  the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King  in a Catholic State.

So Vatican Council II is really saying outside the Catholic Church there is no known salvation and all need to be members of the Church with faith and baptism to avoid Hell ( for salvation).The theology still is outside the Church there is no salvation.
 

This is not the understanding of Vatican Council II among the cardinals and bishops and the present two popes at the Amazon Synod.

For them Vatican Council II II is a rupture with Tradition.There is known salvation outside the Church. So there is a new ecumenism, new ecclesiology, new theology....
 

Lumen Gentium (LG 8, LG 14, LG 16) refers to known salvation outside the Church. It refers to personally known non Catholics saved without faith and baptism.Otherwise how could they be exceptions to traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Lumen Gentium for the Synod refers to people in Heaven visible on earth without the baptism of water.These 'objective people' are projected as  exceptions to exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
So does the Church still claim to have an exclusive and superiority in salvation, Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), was asked by an Associated Press correspondent at the Placuet Deo Press Conference (March 1, 2019)?. He cited Lumen Gentium as an exception.He was saying 'no'.
So there were no known non Catholics for him saved outside the Church with 'elements of sanctification and truth' or where the Church supposedly subsists for him.This was his convoluted reasoning.
The Church is no more ecclesiocentric he wrote in one of the papers of the International Theological Commission, Vatican. Since for him LG 16 and GS 22  are exceptions to traditional EENS.In other words they refer to  known non Catholics in the present times saved outside the Church.
The Lefbvrists did not object since they also interpret Vatican Council II with the same error.They are Cushingites too. 
The sedevacantist CMRI also did not object. Since they too assume there is known salvation outside the Church for us human beings. They project unknown cases of non Catholics saved with the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and in invincible ignorance, as being personally known exceptions to exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church.
Then they blame Vatican Council II for this error, when it is their perspective which is at fault.They blame the popes and then go into sedevacantism.
-Lionel Andrades