Fr. Brian Harrison, Joseph Shaw, John Salza, John Lamont, Thomas Pink and others cannot say all need to enter the Catholic Church as members for salvation and not only those who know about Jesus and the Church. They cannot say this since they wrongly assume BOD, BOB and I.I 1 are objective examples of salvation outside the Church. It is the same for Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester, USA and his Chancellor.Their error comes from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston(LOHO) and the error was included in Vatican Council II.
For there to be an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) there must be a real person saved outside the Catholic Church with faith and baptism. An invisible person, or someone who does not exist in 2019, cannot be an exception to EENS.
The liberal theologians mixed up invisible people as being visible and they were supported by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Vatican.
He was worth his worth in gold for the Masons.
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
We humans cannot know of any exceptions. The norm for salvation is faith and baptism(LG 14, AG 7).
So when the liberals and Lefebvrists say all do not need to enter the Church but only those who know(LG 14) they infere that their are known non Catholics saved outside the Church in invincible ignorance etc. So they are exceptions.-Lionel Andrades
1
BOD( the unknown case of a catechumen saved outside the Church without the baptism of water and instead with a desire for the baptism of water which he or she allegedly did not receive and which was known to someone), BOB( the hypothetical and not personally case of someone saved without the baptism of water and who is in Heaven and which was personally known to someone on earth) and I.I ( the unknown case of a person who was saved in invincible ignorance of the Gospel through no fault of his own and who is in Heaven and was allegedly seen there by someone on earth).
April 30, 2019
DECEMBER 21, 2017
It
does not have to be either the baptism of desire or extra ecclesiam
nulla salus : Just one Religious Superior is needed to understand and
affirm this and we will have changed the Church
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/it-does-not-have-to-be-either-baptism_92.html
DECEMBER 21, 2017
It does not have to be either the baptism of desire or extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Understand this line and then change your interpretation of Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/it-does-not-have-to-be-either-baptism_21.html
__________________________________________
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/a-possibility-in-vatican-council-ii.html
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/ur-3-does-not-contradict-passage-from.html
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-baptism-of-desire-is-not-exception.html
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/bishop-athanasius-schneider-is.html
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/europe-elects-far-right-parties-unite.html
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/boniface-ambrose-could-not-state-it-as.html
________________________________________________________________________________
MAY 25, 2019
A possibility in Vatican Council II cannot be put forward as an exception to EENS. This was the error Pope Francis made on the plane when returning from Abu Dhabihttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/a-possibility-in-vatican-council-ii.html
MAY 30, 2019
UR 3 does not contradict the passage from Mystici Corporis which you have quoted. Would you like to comment ? If UR 3 is not an exception to EENS then there is no Vatican Council II revolution in the text of the Council ?https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/ur-3-does-not-contradict-passage-from.html
MAY 24, 2019
Bishop Schneider did not announce that the interpretation of Vatican Council II by Pope Francis on the flight from Abu Dhabi was heretical
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/bishop-schneider-did-not-announce-that.htmlMAY 24, 2019
Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria supported a theology of religions ! This is heresy
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/pope-benedict-and-cardinal-luiz-ladaria.htmlMAY 22, 2019
Bishop Athanasius Schneider has accepted the new moral theology and so he cannot call a holder or supporter of heresy, a heretic
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/bishop-athanasius-schneider-has.htmlMAY 22, 2019
The Baptism of desire is not an exception to EENS since it does not exist in our reality. This was known to the popes and saints. So the Feeneyite affirms the baptism of desire, he does not reject it. Hypothetical cases cannot be objective exceptions to EENShttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-baptism-of-desire-is-not-exception.html
MAY 21, 2019
Bishop Athanasius Schneider is a theological liberal on faith and morals. He applies the New Theology to faith and morals.He overlooks manifest heresy on faith-issues which can be read on line and he also overlooks mortal sin manifested in repeated pastoral expression which was documented in the Open Letter to the Bishops by some 19 original signatorieshttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/bishop-athanasius-schneider-is.html
MAY 20, 2019
Europe's Christian political parties still do not affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King and the separation of Satanic secularism and statehttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/europe-elects-far-right-parties-unite.html
MAY 20, 2019
St. Ambrose could not state it 'as a fact' that it happened since if it would happen it could only be known to God as a fact. This is the nature of the baptism of desire.It simply does not exist in our realityhttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/boniface-ambrose-could-not-state-it-as.html
MAY 18, 2019
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment