Fr.Jean Marie Gleize at Econe, teaches the same false ecclesiology of the pontifical universities.Vatican Council II is taught as a rupture with Tradition.

 

Fr.Jean Marie Gleize at Econe, teaches the same false ecclesiology of the pontifical universities.Vatican Council II is taught as a rupture with Tradition.

 

Similarly for  Fr. Francois Laisney another theologian and spokesman for the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX), UR 3 and LG 16 in Vatican Council II,would contradict Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
So the same false theology is being taught at the SSPX seminary in Econe by the seminary professors.

I have mentioned this before. There is no denial from the SSPX.Since if they issue a denial they would have to affirm Feeneyite EENS.They want to remain politically correct and protect their personal interests.

So like the professors at the Angelicum and Gregorian University in Rome, they teach error and deception, and keep quiet about it.

They want to preserve their perks, privileges and status and pretend it is Catholic.

 

The SSPX objection to Vatican Council II has no philosophical and theological basis any more.Why should Catholics,interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc, as referring to visible and not invisible cases in 2019? And if they are invisible how can they be exceptions to the past ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus?

Even if a Catholic accepts that all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church( New Theology of CCC 846) he does not have to reject the past ecclesiology and exclusive salvation in the Church. 

Hypothetically all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church and all practically need Catholic faith and baptism of water for salvation(AG 7).
 

Even if hypothetically the Church is the Sacrament of salvation, literally there are no exceptions to exclusive salvation in the Church.There are no literal cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I). There are no literal cases of Catholics saved according to  LG 8, UR 3, GS 27 etc.

All these 50 years the SSPX was wrong on Vatican Council II. They could have interpreted the Council, if they wanted to,in hermony with the past ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and 16th century EENS.

Instead they mis-interpreted the popes and saints, over the centuries, on BOD, BOB and I.I.Unlike the popes and saints, the SSPX like the modernists, interpret BOD, BOB and I.I,when mentioned during the past centuries, as referring to visible and personally known non Catholics.Non Catholics allegedly saved outside the Church. In this way  BOD, BOB and I.I become 'practical' exceptions to EENS for the SSPX and the liberals.

They use this false reasoning to interrpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with the past ecclesiology and exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.-Lionel Andrades