All the books on Vatican Council II at Oxford University have an error. At the St. Benet Hall Oxford they agree with me.There is no denial from the Rector or the professors, resident and visiting, who have been informed by me through e-mails.Even Prof. Joseph Shaw, at Benet Hall, associated with Una Voce International and the Latin Mass Societies, and an author of a book on liturgy, has no denial.

All the books on Vatican Council II at Oxford University have an error. At the St. Benet Hall Oxford they agree with me.There is no denial from the Rector or the professors, resident and visiting, who have been informed by me through e-mails. Prof. Joseph Shaw, at Benet Hall, associated with Una Voce International and the Latin Mass Societies, and an author of a book on liturgy, has no denial.

The writers of books on Vatican Council II , even by traditionalists like Michael Davies and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, confused what is invisible as being visible and then they assumed there was known salvation outside the Catholic Church.

With there being alleged known salvation outside the Church the traditional teaching on no salvation outside the Church became obsolete. So Vatican Council II was interpreted as a rupture with Tradition by them.

This was an irrational interpretation of the Council which did away with the past ecclesiology and ecumenism of return and 16th centunty extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

Pope Benedict and the liberals called it ' a development' i.e using a false premise to create a non traditional conclusion.

The books on Vatican Council II at Oxford University are based upon this development.

-Lionel Andrades