The Lefebvrists are still writing articles and producing books as if all is normal. The liberals refer to them as 'traditionalists'-an approved group, who interpret magisterial documents with a false premise , to create a rupture with Tradition. The liberals do the same.

 

The Lefebvrists are still writing articles and producing books as if all is normal. The liberals refer to them as 'traditionalists'- an approved group, who interpret magisterial documents with a false premise , to create a rupture with Tradition. The liberals do the same.

Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider will not affirm Vatican Council II without the false premise  since then they will be up against the Jewish Left. If they say there are no literal cases of being saved with the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) they would be affirming the past ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).This would be unacceptable for the political Left and ecclesiastical Masonry.
Since the Lefebvrists would be admitting that there can be no practical exceptions to EENS as it was interpreted in the Middle Ages.

When there are no exceptions to the past ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and the 16th century EENS with BOD, BOB and I.I not being exceptions, then Rome has returned to the Faith and the old ecclesiology is there in the Church, once again, at every Holy Mass in all rites.

But the Lefebvrists are not writing on this subject.

-Lionel Andrades