German bishops go ahead with their liberalism based upon a false interpretation of the Council which is now obvious in the books published on Vatican Council II : Next stage of Synodal Path tomorrow

There are so many communication officers and public relations people in the Archdiocese of Munich and Freising and I have been sending them these blog posts.

Tomorrow is the next stage in the German Synodal Way and there are many people in Germany who are reading these blog posts. The number in the USA has also increased.

What is important to note is that the German Synodal Way is based upon an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II which I avoid.

So with all the books in Germany and the numerous theological magazines, interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference, it is important for the German bishops to review what I have been writing.

It is only on this blog that the precise cause of the hermeneutic of rupture is being discussed.

Other media recognise that what the German bishops are proposing, in their liberalism, has its origin in Vatican Council II. The German bishops themselves claim this. However other media, and the German Catholic Church, do not propose interpreting Vatican Council II without the false premise. No one is discussing it.

This is the only blog which is holding out against all of them. The only person standing against all of them.The only person who has stumbled on to their secret and is standing in their way.

At present the Lefebvrists and the liberals interpret Vatican Council II in the same way.The Syllabus of Errors and the past ecclesiology, has exceptions for them. There have to be exceptions for them otherwise there could not be a rupture with the past ecclesiology. If there is no rupture with the past ecclesiology they could not be politically correct with the Left.They need a rupture with Tradition.They need to say outside the Church there is salvation. It is then that they can propose their new ecumenism, new ecclesiology etc.
They will swoop down on any one who proposes EENS with no physical exceptions in the present times. This would be a rejection of the teachings of Pope Benedict and Archbishop Lefebvre.The moment the Lefebvrists or liberals say there are no physical exceptions to EENS in 2020 they enter the Feeneyite camp.

So can you imagine Cardinal Reinhardt Marx and the German bishops saying there are no physical exceptions to the Syllabus of Errors in 2020?
There are no literal exceptions to the Athanasius Creed ( outside the Church there is no salvation) in 2020.Can you picture German seminarians and students saying this?

There are no literal exceptions to the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q, 27Q) with the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance for German religious communities?.
This is something obvious but if the German bishops and priests affirm it they would all be in the Feeneyite camp.

Remember how Michal Voris went to New Hampshire and interviewed Brother Andre Marie and then Church Militiant TV posted the report 'The Strange Doctrines of Fr. Feeney' by Jim Russel which interpreted EENS with exceptions. It interpreted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and Vatican Council II as being exceptions to EENS.

Now the issue is Vatican Council II. It is not EENS.

Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the past ecclesiology and the traditionalists and the German bishops do not want to mention it. 

Cardinal Marx is not affirming Vatican Council II without their being exceptions but neither are the Lefebvrists who were present at the Acies Ordinata assembly in Munich.

So when the communications officers at the Catholic University of Euchstadt-Ingolstadt in the diocese of Cardinal Marx, learn that Vatican Council II can be interpreted without the false premise and so all the books on the Council in their theology section has a mistake, what are they to do?

But still the question is how can the German bishops go ahead with their liberalism based upon a false interpretation of the Council which is now obvious in the books published on Vatican Council II ?

How can the universities continue to tell teachers to teach the irrational version of the Council to students ?

The Synodal Path means telling religious communities that they must interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference to be accepted as religious with a vocation in  Germany? -Lionel Andrades

 JULY 22, 2019

Repost : Church Militant TV slanders Brother Andre Marie MICM and Fr. Leonard Feeney by projecting a false theological position upon them : Jim Russell does not know of any BOD, BOB and I.I case during his life time.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/07/repost-church-militant-tv-slanders.html

APRIL 24, 2019

Jim Russell on Church Militant TV does not refer to hundreds of reports on line saying there are no practical cases of BOD, BOB and I.I. : St. Benedict Center's theological position   https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/04/jim-russell-does-refer-to-hundreds-of.html