Brother Thomas Augustine MICM needs to clarify that he originally accepted Vatican Council II( with the false premise) and that he condoned it in the diocese of Worcester, USA and that he did not affirm Vatican Council II( without the false premise) and so has been granted canonical recognition by the Diocese of Worcester and the CDF and this is approved by Pope Francis.
All the religious communities in Worcester have to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise to be in full communion with the bisshop, the CDF and the pope.
Since Vatican Council II is interpreted with the false premise there is the 'hermeneutic of rupture' with Feeneyite EENS and this is approved by the Jewish Left, for the Catholic Church.
The St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, mean while affirms Feeneyite EENS and also Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premise and inference. So their conclusion is traditional.
With Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally, the CDF and the present two popes, are in schism with the popes over the centuries, who did not use the false premise.Brother Thomas Augustine like the CDF and the religious communities in Worcester, interprets the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) with the false premise. They refer to physically visible and not invisible cases, in the present times (1965-2020).
A clarification is necessary from Brother Thomas Augustine since the New Hapshire community of the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary are accused of being schismatics, when they are not.They affirm Vatican Council II, EENS and BOD, BOB and I.I interpreted without the irrational premise and inference.
It may be mentioned that Archbishop Carlo Vigano, Bishop Athanasius Schneider, Scott Hahn, the Oblate School of Theology,Texas,Jimmy Akin, George Weigel and Taylor Marshall nterpret Vatican Council Ii with the false premise, like Brother Thomas Augustine.
I interpret Vatican Council II and EENS without the false premise ( invisible people are invisible).The false premise says invisible people are visible.I also avoid the false inference ( invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are visible exceptions to EENS) and false and non traditional conclusion ( Vatican Council II has exceptions to EENS and the Athanasius Creed).-Lionel Andrades
JUNE 20, 2020
SBC tell the CDF that you will not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II like the Oblate Dean of Theology in Texas
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/tell-cdf-that-you-will-not-use-false.html
UNE 19, 2020
Bishop McManus and Bro. Thomas Augustine do not affirm Vatican Council II without the false premise : canonical recognition is maintained (Graphics)
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/bishop-mcmanus-and-bro-thomas-augustine.html
________________________________________
JUNE 19, 2020
Canonical recognition for those who use the false premise : Brother Thomas Augustine MICM and St. Benedict Center , Still River approved
JUNE 18, 2020
St.Benedict Center Richmond N.H need to affirm in public Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) by doing this they do not allow people to label them ultra traditionalist or schismatics
JUNE 16, 2020
Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism : rupture with Athanasius Creed created
________________________________________
JUNE 17, 2020
Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano must see the error in the CDF Letter to the St. Benedict Center : all religious communities must use the false premise
JUNE 17, 2020
Archbishop Vigano, CDF and Lefebvrists want the St. Benedict Center to use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, Creeds and Catechisms to create an artitifical rupture with EENS
JUNE 17, 2020
Vigano, Schneider and Lefebvrists keep silent when the Diocese of Manchester, the liberals and the political Left (ADL, SPLC) place ' strict canonical prohibitions and obligations' upon the St.Benedict Center for not affirming EENS with a false premise and inference.
JUNE 17, 2020
Even if the Catholic Church is infiltrated Dr.Taylor Marshall can still interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise. He could interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism and not Cushingism.
JUNE 11, 2020
On the website of the CMRI, of Bishop Pivarunas there is a long list of references to the baptism of desire as mentioned by the saints. But those saints do not interpret the baptism of desire with the false premise. It is the CMRI which uses the false premise to interpret the baptism of desire.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/on-website-of-cmri-of-bishop-pivarunas.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment