Why make subsistit in(Lumen Gentium 8) an issue when we cannot know any one saved outside the Church as such? What has it to do with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) ? How can it be an exception or even relevant to EENS?
Why make 'elements of sanctification and truth'(LG 8) in other religions relevant to EENS? We cannot know of any one saved outside the Church as such. So it does not contradict exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
LG 8 always refers to hypothetical cases. It cannot be anything else.
For the Oblate Dean of Theology at Oblate School of Theology, Texas, USA,LG 8( subsist in )was a reference to a visible and known non Catholic saved outside the Church.it wa an objective exception to EENS. So he mentioned it as an exception.Then he also made broad conclusions.
Also for Matthew Ramage , writing for Scott Hahn's Sr. Paul Center, these were visible exceptions to EENS. They were not hypothetical cases only, as they are for me.
Similarly Patricia Chadwick used the false premise. She assumed what was invisible was visible. So Vatican Council II contradicted her father's 'rigid theological position' on EENS. -Lionel Andrades
JUNE 19, 2020
Academic Dean of Oblate School of Theology,uses a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II to create a non traditional conclusion and the hermeneutic of rupture
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/academic-dean-of-oblate-school-of.html
JUNE 20, 2020
JUNE 20, 2020
Patricia Chadwick's book Little Sister calls the St.Benedict Center, New Hamphire schismatics
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/patricia-chadwicks-book-little-sister.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment