Scott Hahn, George Weigel,Jimmy Akins have to say that the popes were wrong since Pius XII ?

When I say invisible people cannot be objective exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the traditional teaching on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, it is a criticism of the teachings of the popes since Pius XII.It is a criticism of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) Letter to the Archbishop of Boston 1949 and Vatican Council II.  Pope Paul Paul VI made a mistake . He could have interpreted Vatican Council II assuming invisible people were simply inviisble. Pope Francis can still correct the error.

Jimmy Akins knows what I say is true and he has no counter arguement. So he simply ignores me.Asking him to admite that Catholic Answers was wrong on Vatican Council II all these years, because they chose the false premise, is too much.

George Weigel ignores me. He knows what I am saying is rational and correct. It is the same with the other scholars at the Ethics and Public Policy Center,Washington where they all unethically interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and this is politically correct for them.

The new revelation in the Church is a new tradition based upon hypothetical cases not being hypothetical in 1949-2020.In this superficial way division is created in the Church.

Now Scott Hahn has a choice. Does he choose EENS according to the Church Fathers with invincible ignorance etc not being an exception to exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church,  or will it continue to be EENS according to the new revelation; the special revelation in the Church founded upon the false premise and inference.-Lionel Andrades

JUNE 20, 2020

St.Paul Center interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise and so rejects the interpretation of outside the Church no salvation according to the Church Fathers.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/stpaul-center-interprets-vatican.html