I affirm Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms without the false premise. I affirm the first part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) and reject the second part of LOHO which contradicts the first part with the help of a false premise. The ecclesiology of the Catholic Church before and after Vatican Council II is the same for me.There is no traditional-liberal division for me since in Vatican Council II there are no exceptions to Tradition.Hypothetical and theoretical cases cannot be objective exceptions to traditional Syllabus of Errors, extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Athansius Creed. There is no development of doctrine for me since I do not interpret Magisterial documents with a fake premise. So I am a conservative and orthodox Catholic, an uncomplicated one, neither of the Left or Right. I would expect non Christians to tolerate my Catholic beliefs and Catholics, the present traditionalists and liberals, to also affirm them

 I affirm Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms without the false premise. I affirm the first part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) and reject the second part of LOHO which contradicts the first part with the help of a false premise.

The ecclesiology of the Catholic Church before and after Vatican Council II is the same for me.There is no traditional-liberal division for me since in Vatican Council II there are no exceptions to Tradition.Hypothetical and theoretical cases cannot be objective exceptions to traditional Syllabus of Errors, extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Athansius Creed.

There is no development of doctrine for me since I do not interpret Magisterial documents  with a fake premise. So I am a conservative and orthodox Catholic, an uncomplicated one, neither of the Left or Right.

I would expect non Christians to tolerate my Catholic beliefs and Catholics, the present traditionalists and liberals, to also affirm them.-Lionel Andrades