Pope Benedict used a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, misled Catholics and created division within the Church. The sedevacantist community Congregatio Mariae Reginae Immaculatae(CMRI) of Bishop Mark Pivarunas, must stop using the false premise and give up their sedevacantism

 Pope Benedict used a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, misled Catholics and created division within the Church. The sedevacantist community Congregatio Mariae Reginae Immaculatae(CMRI) of Bishop Mark Pivarunas, must stop using the false premise  and give up their sedevacantism.

The Society of St. Pius X (SPPX ) too must stop using the false premise, re-interpret Vatican Council II rationally and ask for canonical recognition.

The Franciscans of the Immaculate too can affirm Vatican Council II without the false premise and ask Cardinal Braz de Avez to do the same.

Michael and Peter Dimond at the sedevantist Most Holy Family Monastery  too can affirm Vatican Council II and the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance, without the false premise and end their sedevacantism based upon the Council. They could admit that Bishop Pierre Thuc like Arhcbishop Lefebvre, Michael Davis, Amerio Romano, Dietrich von Hildebrand and others made a mistake.

Why are traditionalists interpreting Vatican Council II according to the political Left ? Why are they using the false premise to change traditional theology ? SSPX...-Lionel Andrades