Pope Francis has called for interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference to create an artificial rupture with Tradition and the traditional teaching on their being exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church : this is unethical.Even the secular and Church- judges in Italy are following this error.

 The Pope’s second point had to do with catechesis and the future. In 2020, the church in Italy marked the 50th anniversary of the “renewal of catechesis” following the Second Vatican Council. “The catechesis inspired by the Council,” said Pope Francis, “is continually listening to the heart of the man, always with an attentive ear, always seeking to renew itself.”

Pope Francis insisted: “This is the Magisterium. The Council is the Magisterium of the Church. Either you are with the Church and therefore you follow the Council, and if you don't follow the Council or you interpret it in your own away, as you desire, you do not stand with the Church.” He asked that there be "no concessions to those who seek to present a catechesis that does not agree with the Magisterium of the Church.” - Pope Francis: Catechesis is the echo of the Word of God

https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2021-01/pope-francis-catechesis-is-the-echo-of-the-word-of-god.html

Pope Francis has called for interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference to create an artificial rupture with Tradition and the traditional teaching on their being exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.

He calls the interpretation of the Council- by confusing what is invisible as being visible- as being Magisterial.This is unlike the Jesuits of the 16th century who interpreted the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and other Magisterial documents without the false premise.

So now the present 'magisterium' will contradict the past Magisterium, without any new revelation in Vatican Council II or the Catholic Church.

With the use of the false premise, the present two popes tell us that there is 'a development of doctrine'. Without the false premise it is observed that there is no development.

It is now discovered that Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the Athanasius Creed which says all need to be Catholic for salvation. Since hypothetical cases in the Council-text, LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc, are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church in 1965-2021.

The Council does not contradict the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church.

But by assuming that LG 8 etc, refer to physically visible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church, in the present times , a false rupture is created with Tradition, the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX is made obsolete, by Pope Francis and Pope Benedict.

It is with the false premise, the confusing of what is subjective as being objective, that the 'strict' interpretation of EENS is rejected. 

With the discovery of this institutional error, and  it's continued use by the present two popes, the Vatican statement seems unethical.

There cannot be a kerygma without inviting people to Jesus within the Catholic Church. The Church is the Mystical Body of Jesus. There cannot be a separation of Jesus from the Church or the Kingdom of Heaven from the Catholic Church(Dominus Iesus etc).

The Catechism of the Catholic Church states that God wants all people to be united in the Catholic Church and that the Church is like the Ark of Noah that saves in the Flood ( CCC 845). The Catechism also says all need faith and baptism for salvation ( CCC 846, AG 7).

The Catechism of Pope Pius X( 24Q, 27Q) is in harmony with the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II, interpreted without the irrational premise.-Lionel Andrades

https://spiritdaily.org/blog/news/francis-in-broadside-against-those-who-reject-vatican-ii