Wednesday, February 10, 2021

The Doctrinal Beliefs of the St. Benedict Center could clarify that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) and the Diocese of Manchester use a false premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, the dogma exta ecclesiam nulla salus , Catechism of the Catholic Church and the Magisterial documents

Comments from   REPLY TO FR. GEORGES DE LAIRE  ON CHURCH MILITANT TV


The Doctrinal Beliefs of the St. Benedict Center could clarify that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) and the Diocese of Manchester use a false premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, the dogma exta ecclesiam nulla salus , Catechism of the Catholic Church and the Magisterial documents.


INTRODUCTION

The following exposition of the doctrinal beliefs of the Saint Benedict Center has as its core those propositions extracted from a letter dated March 7, 2017 authored by Brother André Marie, acting as the representative of the Saint Benedict Center, addressed to the Diocese of Manchester and copied to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

Neither the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith nor the Diocese of Manchester have ever qualified the following beliefs as “unacceptable.”

The following propositions are provided here to lend greater clarity and depth to the doctrinal tenets of the Saint Benedict Center. They are all subject to the “disclaimer” found at the end of this page.

DOCTRINAL BELIEFS

  1. The members of the Saint Benedict Center believe with Divine and Catholic Faith all those things contained in the Word of God, written or handed on, that is, in the one Deposit of Faith entrusted to the Church, and at the same time proposed as divinely revealed either by the Solemn Magisterium of the Church or by its Ordinary and Universal Magisterium which is manifested by the common adherence of the Christian faithful under the leadership of the Sacred Magisterium, avoiding any doctrines whatsoever contrary to them.1
     
Lionel: It is not Magisterial when the present popes assumed unknown cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I)  are known people saved out side the Church. We can accept BOD, BOB and I.I as hypothetical cases only and not as practical exceptions to EENS.
2. We embrace and retain each and every thing which is proposed definitively by the Magisterium of the Church concerning the doctrine of Faith and Morals, that is, each and every thing which is required to safeguard reverently and to expound faithfully the same Deposit of Faith.2

Lionel: The present interpretation of Vatican Council II with a false premise contradicts the past Magisterium. One Magisterium cannot contradict another.One of the two has to be wrong. The present ecclesiastics use a false premise to contradict the past Magisterium.
_________________

3.We adhere with submission of will and intellect to the teachings which either the Roman Pontiff or the College of Bishops enunciate when they exercise their authentic Magisterium, even if they do not intend to proclaim these teachings by a definitive act.3
Lionel : The past Magisterium did not interpret the Nicene Creed with a false premise. 
The past Magisterium did not use the false premise to reject the Athanasius Creed.
The past Magisterium did not interpret the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance with the false premise to create practical exceptions to EENS and a new version of EENS.
They did not change the interpretation of BOD, BOB and I.I with a false premise and so change the understanding of all the Catechisms.
This is doctrinal chaos and it is not Magisterial.
The false premise in the interpretation of Magisterial documents is not mentioned in the St. Benedict Center Doctrinal Beliefs.
______________________

Lionel  : The possibility of salvation outside the Church is accepted hypothetically only. Speculatively.

We affirm that those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and His Church have the possibility of obtaining eternal salvation.17 This proposition is affirmed in conjunction with all of the other conditions sine qua non for salvation explicitly narrated in the Epistula ad Archiepiscopum Bostoniensem of 8 August 1949 referenced in footnote n. 342 of the CCC, which themselves are referenced as extracted from the Encyclical Letter Mystici Corporis Christi of Pope Ven. Pius XII, namely: 1) perfect Charity (“perfecta caritate”) and 2) Supernatural Faith (“fidem supernaturalem”)18 Such souls can and must be united to Jesus Christ through his Mystical Body, the Catholic Church.19
  1. We affirm that for non-Christians, salvation in Christ is accessible [“patens”] by virtue of a grace, which, coming from Christ and communicated by the Holy Spirit, has a relationship with the Church, and is bestowed by God in ways known to God Himself.23
     
How God Almighty chooses to exercise His omnipotence in “difficult cases” is not ours to say. In keeping with the teaching of Pope Bl. Pius IX in Singulari Quadam, referenced above, it is not for man, a mere creature, to “arrogate” to himself such judgments. And, as the Holy Father says in that same Allocution, “let us hold most firmly that, in accordance with Catholic teaching, there is ‘one God, one faith, one baptism”’ [Eph. 4:5].”24 Hence the importance we attach to preaching the necessity of sacramental Baptism and joining the Catholic Church without exception.
Lionel: So hypothetically only  Brother Andre Marie MICM does not reject invincible ignorance etc.
For the present ecclesiastics, the two popes, the International Theological Commission, Vatican and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican and the Diocese of Manchester and the Archdiocese of Boston, invincible ignorance is not hypothetical but an objective exception to 16th century EENS. This point must also be cleared in the Doctrinal Beliefs. .-Lionel Andrades
https://catholicism.org/doctrinal-belief.html

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/02/brother-andre-marie-micm-could-inform.html

https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/reply-to-fr-georges-de-laire

_______________________

No comments: