Don Pietro Leone interprets Vatican Council II irrationally like Bishop Barron and the liberals and indicates that he also interprets the Nicene and Apostles Creed , irrationally, heretically and schismatically.
Much of what Don Leone has written on Vatican Council II (Don Pietro Leone: The Council and the Eclipse of God – PART V) on Rorate Caeil is abstract. The Council-text does not contradict his statements.
For him the Council contradicts Tradition and in particular exclusive salvation, since he uses a false premise. He misinterprets LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being exceptions to Feeneyirte extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). Since they are practical exceptions for him he implies that they are physically visible cases. Otherwise they could not be exceptions.
There are two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one rational and the other irrational and Don Leone interprets Vatican Council II like the liberals and Pope Benedict. This is the political version of the Council approved also by Una Voce International and the Latin Mass societies and the liberals in general.
Since 2014 Rorate Caeili and Don Leone have been posting reports on Vatican Council II without responding to objections.
There is no unity with them on the Creeds, since there is no unity on Vatican Council II, and since, going further back, there is no unity on the baptism of desire, invincible ignorance and extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO).They follow the objective error of LOHO. It is approved by the Left and Pope Francis even though it violates the Principle of Non Contradiction. - Lionel Andrades
https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2021/03/don-pietro-leone-council-and-eclipse-of_11.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment