The Lefebvrists, Thucs and Feeneyites are interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise like Bishop Steven J. Lopes the first bishop of the Ordinariate of the Chair of Saint Peter and pastor to all its members and clergy in the United States and Canada.
So nothing can be done by them regarding the case of Fr. Vaughn Treco. -Lionel Andrades
https://ordinariate.net/bishop-lopes
The next time a traditionalist priest is transferred or dismissed the bloggers should not just report it critically. They must not just accept the unjust decision assuming the traditionalist-liberal division is normal. They must not assume that the ' development of doctrine' is normal and so they cannot do anything about it. Since if a traditionalist priest is excommunicated it is the bishop who interprets Vatican Council II irrationally. His liberalism is not normal. The Council interpreted rationally supports the traditional priest.The issue is doctrinal and theological. It is the bishop who interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and creates division in the Catholic Church.-L.A________________
JULY 15, 2019
Bishop Steven Lopes does not interpret Vatican Council II without the irrationality and has excommunicated Fr. Vaughn Treco.
It is a mortal sin of faith for Bishop Steven J.Lopes and the ecclesiastics at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) to reject the Athanasius which says outside the Church there is no salvation.They are automatically excommunicated.To interpret invincible ignorance as referring to personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church and then postulate this as an exception to the Athanasius Creed, is a mortal sin of faith. It is public heresy.
Fr. Vaughn Treco was not obliged to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as referring to known examples of salvation outside the Church.This was the public heresy of Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the CDF at the Plaquet Deo Press Conference on March 1,2018.He made a direct attack on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).He pretended that Lumen Gentium 8 referred to known people saved outside the Church. Fr.Vaught Treco like Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was correct. Vatican Council II interpreted with hypothetical cases assumed to be objective and practical examples of salvation outside the Church and so exceptions to EENS, is irrational, deceptive and heretical.Bishop Steven Lopes is not accepting Vatican Council II with LG 8, LG 14,LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc being only theoretical cases in 2019 and so they are not exceptions of the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return. He is not being excommunicatd by complicit and ideological CDF and instead is supported.He was allowed to study theology at the Gregorian Pontifical University since he did not say that the Holy Office (CDF) made an objective error in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case and the same mistake as repeated at Vatican Council II.If he expressed the truth the Vatican and the Left would not allow him to receive a doctorate in theology.May be Fr. Vaugh Treco did not know how Vatican Council II can be interpeted without the error of the liberal theologians Rahner and Ratzinger.
May be Bishop Steven Lopes knows that he can interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise and inference but if does do so he would be removed like Fr. Carlos Eugenio Irarrázaval Errazuriz auxiliary bishop of the Archdiocese of Santiago, who made statements opposed by the Jewish Left.
So the bishop does not interpret Vatican Council II without the irrationality and has excommunicated Fr. Vaughn Treco.-Lionel Andrades
He has been ‘excommunicated’ for the ‘crime’ of Catholicism!
~ An Old Curmudgeon
It is a mortal sin of faith for Bishop Steven J.Lopes and the ecclesiastics at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) to reject the Athanasius which says outside the Church there is no salvation.They are automatically excommunicated.
To interpret invincible ignorance as referring to personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church and then postulate this as an exception to the Athanasius Creed, is a mortal sin of faith. It is public heresy.
Fr. Vaughn Treco was not obliged to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as referring to known examples of salvation outside the Church.This was the public heresy of Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the CDF at the Plaquet Deo Press Conference on March 1,2018.He made a direct attack on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).He pretended that Lumen Gentium 8 referred to known people saved outside the Church.
Fr.Vaught Treco like Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was correct. Vatican Council II interpreted with hypothetical cases assumed to be objective and practical examples of salvation outside the Church and so exceptions to EENS, is irrational, deceptive and heretical.
Bishop Steven Lopes is not accepting Vatican Council II with LG 8, LG 14,LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc being only theoretical cases in 2019 and so they are not exceptions of the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return. He is not being excommunicatd by complicit and ideological CDF and instead is supported.
He was allowed to study theology at the Gregorian Pontifical University since he did not say that the Holy Office (CDF) made an objective error in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case and the same mistake as repeated at Vatican Council II.
If he expressed the truth the Vatican and the Left would not allow him to receive a doctorate in theology.
May be Fr. Vaugh Treco did not know how Vatican Council II can be interpeted without the error of the liberal theologians Rahner and Ratzinger.
May be Bishop Steven Lopes knows that he can interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise and inference but if does do so he would be removed like Fr. Carlos Eugenio Irarrázaval Errazuriz auxiliary bishop of the Archdiocese of Santiago, who made statements opposed by the Jewish Left.
So the bishop does not interpret Vatican Council II without the irrationality and has excommunicated Fr. Vaughn Treco.-Lionel Andrades
So the bishop does not interpret Vatican Council II without the irrationality and has excommunicated Fr. Vaughn Treco.-Lionel Andrades
He has been ‘excommunicated’ for the ‘crime’ of Catholicism!
~ An Old Curmudgeon
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2019
Fr. Vaughn Treco's excommunication needs to be revoked(The bishop interprets Vatican Council II and the Creeds and Catechisms with a false premise to reject Tradition. Canonically he is at fault. His liberalism can only be justified with the false premise. Without the false premise Vatican Council II would support Fr. Vaughn Treco.)
There are so many Catholics in Bridgeport, Connecticut, USA and none of them tell their bishop that Lumen Gentium does not contradict the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).The Council is Feeneyite. It does not contradict Feeneyite EENS.Vatican Council II Feeneyite, does not contradict EENS, Feeneyite.
Similarly there was so much confusion among the supporters of Fr. Vaughn Treco who was recently excommunicated in another diocese.It was Fr.Treco's bishop who needed to affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with EENS and the past ecclesiology.Instead he chose to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with the Catechisms and the Creeds and this was not considered heresy by conservative Catholics.The excommunication of Fr. Treco must be revoked and Vatican Council II must be interpreted in harmony with EENS, the Syllabus of Errors etc.When Fr. Treco affirms EENS he supported by Vatican Council II, Feeneyite.
When his bishop interprets Vatican Council II, he is interpreting it with irrational Cushingism and so there is a break with EENS, the past exclusive ecclesiology of the Catholic Church and an ecumenism of return. With EENS and Vatican Council II Feeneyite, there is no theological opening for the new ecumenism and other things new.
Bishop Caggiano and the apologists at Catholic Answers must do the same otherwise they support heresy and schism.
Similarly the Rector of the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit and the Archbishop of Detroit, must affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with EENS and without the irrationality of the Letter of the Holy Office 1959. The same needs to be done also by Ralph Martin and Robert Fastiggi, professors of theology at the seminary.
The present two popes need to be shown how Lumen Gentium does not contradict EENS according to the Magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century who were not limited by the false reasoning of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.-Lionel Andrades
There are so many Catholics in Bridgeport, Connecticut, USA and none of them tell their bishop that Lumen Gentium does not contradict the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).The Council is Feeneyite. It does not contradict Feeneyite EENS.Vatican Council II Feeneyite, does not contradict EENS, Feeneyite.
Similarly there was so much confusion among the supporters of Fr. Vaughn Treco who was recently excommunicated in another diocese.
It was Fr.Treco's bishop who needed to affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with EENS and the past ecclesiology.Instead he chose to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with the Catechisms and the Creeds and this was not considered heresy by conservative Catholics.
The excommunication of Fr. Treco must be revoked and Vatican Council II must be interpreted in harmony with EENS, the Syllabus of Errors etc.When Fr. Treco affirms EENS he supported by Vatican Council II, Feeneyite.
When his bishop interprets Vatican Council II, he is interpreting it with irrational Cushingism and so there is a break with EENS, the past exclusive ecclesiology of the Catholic Church and an ecumenism of return. With EENS and Vatican Council II Feeneyite, there is no theological opening for the new ecumenism and other things new.
When his bishop interprets Vatican Council II, he is interpreting it with irrational Cushingism and so there is a break with EENS, the past exclusive ecclesiology of the Catholic Church and an ecumenism of return. With EENS and Vatican Council II Feeneyite, there is no theological opening for the new ecumenism and other things new.
Bishop Caggiano and the apologists at Catholic Answers must do the same otherwise they support heresy and schism.
Similarly the Rector of the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit and the Archbishop of Detroit, must affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with EENS and without the irrationality of the Letter of the Holy Office 1959. The same needs to be done also by Ralph Martin and Robert Fastiggi, professors of theology at the seminary.
The present two popes need to be shown how Lumen Gentium does not contradict EENS according to the Magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century who were not limited by the false reasoning of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.-Lionel Andrades
The present two popes need to be shown how Lumen Gentium does not contradict EENS according to the Magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century who were not limited by the false reasoning of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment