Repost : Benedictine bishops, like other bishops and cardinals, do not affirm de fide teachings of the Catholic Church. They are denying it in public. This is manifest heresy and a mortal sin : Most Holy Family Monastery, USA

 

 OCTOBER 4, 2018

Benedictine bishops, like other bishops and cardinals, do not affirm de fide teachings of the Catholic Church. They are denying it in public. This is manifest heresy and a mortal sin ( The Crossroads at 23rd Street )

1917 Code of Canon Law (Can. 146) and the Legitimacy of the MHFM

1917 Code of Canon Law
Book I: General Norms (Can. 1-6)
Title IX: Ecclesiastical Offices (Can. 145-196)
Chapter I: The Provision of Ecclesiastical Office
Can. 146: "An ecclesiastical office cannot be validly obtained without canonical provision".

Canonical Provision: It comprises three distinct acts - the designation of the person, canonical institution, and installation. In various ways a person may be designated to fill a vacant benefice: by election, postulation, presentation, or recommendation, resignation made in one's favor, or approved exchange. In all cases confirmation by the proper ecclesiastical superior of the selection made is required, while letters of appointment, as a rule, must be presented.

Lionel: However the person must affirm the teachings of the Catholic Church, this is also a requirement.I mentioned in a previous post that the 'official Benedictines' reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), they interpret the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) as referring to known people saved outside the Church when practically there are no such known people. They affirm irrational Vatican Council II (Cushingite) which is a rupture with Tradition.It is heretical and schismatic.They do not accept Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) which is in harmony with the past ecclesiology, the Syllabus of Errors, EENS and the Catechisms.

So Michael and Peter Dimond would call the official Benedictines and the other religious communities, 'the Vatican Council II sect 'and consider them anathema. I would call them the 'false church' ,with new doctrines created with a New Theology, within the true Church.

This is also a canonical issue.

___________________________________

Reception of administration by a chapter without such letters brings excommunication reserved to the pope, together with privation of the fruits of the benefice; and the nominee loses “ipso facto” all right to the prelacy. Ordinarily greater benefices are conferred by the pope; minor benefices by the bishop, who as a rule has the power of appointing to all benefices in his diocese. The pope, however, owing to the fullness of his jurisdiction, may appoint to any benefice whatsoever.

Thus, the law is clear ... without legitimacy (canonical provision), without the consecrated authority to act on God’s behalf to establish an ecclesiastical office [a monastery] to preach / teach the scattered flock, even with the best of intentions, it is against the Code of Canon Law bringing with it an “ipso facto” sentence of excommunication.

Lionel: The two popes and the cardinals and bishops assume invisible BOD, BOB and I.I are visible exceptions to the dogma EENS as it was known, for example, to the Magisterium of the 16th century. All those who want to enter religious life have to accept this heresy.This is first class heresy since the Nicene Creed has been changed.

I would not be able to enter a religious community since for me invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are not visible exceptions to EENS. Similarly Michael and Peter would have no chance of joining the Benedictines since they affirm traditional EENS.BOD, BOB and I.I are not exceptions to EENS for them.

This is a canonical issue. 

___________________________________

Next; as found within the 1918 version of The New Canon Law: A Commentary and Summary of the New Code of Canon Law; by Rev. Stanislaus Woywod, O.F.M.
The Second Book: Laws Concerning Persons
Part I: Laws Concerning the Clergy
Section II: Clerics Individually
Title VII: The Supreme Authority and Those who by Law Share in it

(146) The Supreme Authority alone can erect ecclesiastical provinces, dioceses, abbeys [monasteries] or prelatures nullius, vicariates apostolic, prefectures apostolic; or change their limits, divide, unite, suppress them.

Lionel: The New Code of Canon Law expects Catholics to say that invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are visible. Then they have to interpret Magisterial documents with this irrationality.

This is an impediment to being a Catholic . A Catholic has to affirm this irrationality, heresy and schism to be in good standing with the Church.

It is a canon law issue.

____________________________________

The FACTs:

• Joseph Natale (1932-1995), the founder of the “concept” MHFM, was a layman and NEVER was a professed religious.
• Joseph Natale NEVER received permission from a Benedictine Bishop (delegated by the Supreme Authority) to establish his congregation.
• The same applies to Frederick “Michael” Dimond.

Thus ... NO Canonical Provision.

Lionel: They do not want Canonical Provision from heretical ecclesiastics who do not recant and corrent themselves  in public even after being informed of the error.

___________________________________

Simply put ... the Dimond Brothers of the MHFM, as laymen, are acting outside the laws of the Church established in 1917 ... long before Vatican II was ever held.

Lionel: The 'Church' today is a rupture with the Church in the pre-1930's since a false premise is used to interpret Vatican Council II. This can be avoided. But the duplicity is continued for political reasons.

The 'Church' needs to correct itself doctrinally and theologically and then invite Peter and Michael Dimond, the SSPX and other traditionalists and sedevacantist, into the Church, with full canonical status.

___________________________________

In the Canon Law Digest, Volume 3, Can. 147 (page 71) it reads: “Excommunication as vitandus is inflicted for accepting office from a lay authority.”; which is exactly the grievous error committed by Bro. Michael when he self-declared himself, as a layman, Superior of the MHFM.

For it is clearly indicated concerning the “official” Benedictine requirements for obtaining the legitimate position of a Superior within a Benedictine monastery:

Lionel: The CDF Prefect, Cardinal Luiz Ladaria Sj at the Placuet Deo Press Conference this year denied the dogma EENS and re-interpreted Vatican Council II with an irrational premise.He also did not affirm Vatican Council II ( without the premise).This was all done in  public.This too would result in automatic excommunication according to the Magisterium of the past.

_________________________________

1910 “Declarations on the Rule of Our Holy Father St. Benedict and Statutes of the American-Cassinese Congregation” / permissu superiorum (by permission of the superiors), approved by the HOLY SEE under Pope Pius X (page 55):

“No one, however, can be elected unless he has made solemn vows, is ordained to the priesthood and belongs to our congregation.”

Lionel : He must also affirm the dogma EENS according to St.Benedict.

________________________________

Denzinger: The Sources of Catholic Dogma

967 Can. 7: “If anyone says that ... those who have been neither rightly ordained nor sent by ecclesiastical and canonical authority, but come from a different source, are lawful ministers of the word …: let him be anathema [cf. n. 960].”

Lionel : Any one who changes the meaning of the Nicene Creed and rejects the dogma EENS is also anathema.

________________________________

Anathema is a ban or curse solemnly pronounced by ecclesiastical authority and accompanied by excommunication.

To reiterate the FACTs:

• Joseph Natale was a layman and NEVER was a professed religious.
• Joseph Natale NEVER received permission from a Benedictine Bishop (delegated by the Supreme Authority) to establish his congregation.
• Joseph Natale NEVER received “Holy Orders”, was NEVER ordained to the priesthood, and therefore had NO legitimate claim to the position / title of Superior.
• The same applies to Frederick “Michael” Dimond.

Thus, once again ... NO Canonical Provision.

Lionel : Benedictine bishops, like all other bishops and cardinals, do not affirm de fide teachings of the Catholic Church. They are denying it in public. This is manifest heresy and a mortal sin.

____________________________________

It is unfortunate, indeed, that there are a multitude of obstinate persons who do not quite, or willfully refuse, to understand that the purpose of this project is NOT an attempt to unjustly defame or denigrate the innocent; but rather it is a continued effort to keep on “sounding the alarm” concerning the fraud being perpetuated upon the “scattered flock” by a narcistic, miscreant by the name of Frederick “Michael” Dimond; posing as an ecclesiastic Superior within his secular “not-for-profit corporation”; disguised as a self-identified Order of St Benedict (OSB) deceitfully called the “Most Holy Family Monastery” (MHFM).

It's still not too late to repent Brother Michael.

Lionel: The unknown, anonymous owner of this website/blog as a Catholic could also respond to these posts.-Lionel Andrades

---

THURSDAY, OCTOBER 10, 2013

Apostasy of the religious orders

The following report is from the website of the sedevacantists Most Holy Family Monastery. They wrongly assume that there are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and so they reject the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.

 

However they are correct in affirming that outside the church there is no salvation.However they are not aware that Vatican Council II (AG 7) is in agreement with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as they affirm it. They wrongly assume that LG 16,LG 8 etc refer to explicit cases known in the present times.So they believe that the Council contradicts the Catholic Church's traditional treaching on other religions and Christian communties and churches.

 

They are correct in assuming however that  Catholics, reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus including religious.However the MHFM is not aware that they reject the dogma since they,also like the MHFM,assume there are known exceptions in the present times, an error being made by Pope Francis,  Catholic religious communities and traditionalists who are not sedevacantists.

 

With the error of the visible dead who are exceptions to the dogma on salvation not being checked all these years the pendulum has swung in the extreme direction, it can be seen from some of the statements of religious communities.

 

I accept Pope Francis as my pope and hope that the heretical rejection of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Vatican Council II (AG 7,LG 14),which is agreement with the dogma  and the Catechism of the Catholic Church(846) which says all need to enter the Church 'as  through a door', will be corrected in future.

It is important to note that Mother Teresa was faithful to Jesus and the Church. However the interpretation on other religions, as reported here, is held by Missionaries of Charity superiors, men and women and so now they have made the fourth vow optional in their community. The fourth vow which Mother Teresa enshrined in the community was Fidelity to the Magisterium.It is no more obligatory for an MC Sister or Priest to make this vow.

Also novices are taught that being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire are known exceptions to the need for every one to convert into the Church. So LG 16 contradicts AG 7. This is being described as a 'mystery' which Catholic novices have to accept to enter the MC community in Rome at their Religious House of Formation.

-Lionel Andrades

Apostasy of the religious orders

http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/32_Religiousorders.pdf

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/10/benedictine-bishops-like-all-other.html

_________________________

APRIL 8, 2021

Michael and Peter Dimond at the Most Holy Family Monastery, USA now know that they have made a major mistake on Vatican Council II

 

 

E-Exchanges on various issues

 

*This section of our website (which is updated daily) contains some less formal – and short – e-mail exchanges that we’ve had which we feel may be of value to our readers.  We will include those portions of the exchanges we deem relevant and valuable.  We often add bolding and underlining which are not necessarily that of the other party.  This section also frequently includes, not only e-exchanges we have, but also our notes, updates and comments.  Section containing some important recent posts.*

 

New Video Posted

 

John Paul II Taught That The Gospel Is To Believe In Yourself

 

MHFM: Among other things, this video covers John Paul II's shocking exegesis of the one "from above", the description Jesus used for Himself in John 8:23.

 

Times

 

Watch People Get Arrested For Not Wearing A Mask

 

Dark times indeed.

 

MacDonald

 

First

 

Watch People Get Arrested For Not Wearing A Mask

 

First it’s for not wearing a mask, then it will be for not being vaccinated...

 

Danster

 

New Video Posted

 

Watch People Get Arrested For Not Wearing A Mask

 

To convert

 

Hello, my name is Daniel and I live in Portland, Oregon. I've read the Penny catechism and have watched a lot of your videos. I think I'm fully convinced of the Catholic faith and wish to convert…

 

Watched

 

Thomistic Basics (Act & Potency) Refute A Heretic On The Incarnation

 

Glad that I watched this video, it gives an excellent explanation…

 

A C

 

Information

 

The Best Argument Against "Baptism of Desire"

 

A lot of excellent information! A lot of interesting information!

 

Reggie Johnson

https://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/E-Exchanges.php?utm_source=WPhp&utm_medium=Recent&utm_campaign=Theme2020