All Pope Benedict's books on Vatican Council II were written with the common flaw. How can Pope Francis accept Alberto Melloni making the same mistake on Vatican Council II.The Council, knowingly being interpreted with a false premise, cannot be Magisterial.Bishop Roberto Barron and Massimo Faggioli are using the same fake premise to interpret Vatican Council II. - Lionel Andrades
APRIL 20, 2021
Almost all the TV Stations in Italy have had to interview Alberto Melloni and project his non Magisterial interpretation of Vatican Council II with the false premise
Almost all the TV Stations in Italy have had to interview Alberto Melloni and project his non Magisterial interpretation of Vatican Council II with the false premise. - Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 26, 2021
The new Italian Prime Minister Mario Dragi accepts Prof. Alberto Melloni's official interpretation of Vatican Council II which is dishonest
The new Italian Prime Minister Mario Dragi accepts Prof. Alberto Melloni's official interpretation of Vatican Council II which is dishonest.
Melloni's Bologna School, is funded by the Italian leftist government.
Melloni like Dragi unethically uses a false premise to make Vatican Council II emerge as a rupture with the Italy's popes and saints over history. -Lionel Andrades
JANUARY 7, 2021
Prof.Alberto Melloni's interpretations are obsolete
Move over Prof.Alberto Melloni.Your system is antiquated, outdated. Obsolete. -Lionel Andrades
DECEMBER 7, 2020
If Prof. Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School would interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise of the New Theology, the Italian Government may not continue to finance him.He would be taking the Catholic Church back to Tradition
If Prof. Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School would interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise of the New Theology, the Italian Government may not continue to finance him.He would be taking the Catholic Church back to Tradition. -Lionel Andrades
John XXIII Foundation for Religious Sciences (FSCIRE), the "Bologna School, interprets Vatican Council II with the common false premise.There is no transparency on this issue
FEBRUARY 22, 2020
ATHANASIUS CREED
___________________________________
JANUARY 3, 2020
John XXIII Foundation for Religious Sciences (FSCIRE), the "Bologna School, interprets Vatican Council II with the common false premise.There is no transparency on this issue
ATHANASIUS CREED
___________________________________
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 24, 2020
Pope Francis interprets the Creeds with a false premise, inference and conclusion. This was un precedented over the centuries.
Pope Francis interprets the Creeds with a false premise, inference and conclusion. This was un precedented over the centuries.
______________________________
MARCH 5, 2020
All the books in Italy which cite Vatican Council II, in general are in error, since the Council is interpreted with a false premise, inference and conclusion. So it is wrong for the Italian Government to annually finance the Fondazione per le scienze religiose Giovanni XXIII( Bologna School )of Alberto Melloni. He receives about a million a year it is reported.
http://www.fscire.it/index.php/en/series/the-history-of-vatican-ii/
MARCH 5, 2020
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/03/all-books-and-articles-on-vatican.html
_________________________
La Scuola di Bologna sul Concilio Vaticano II dello storico Alberto Melloni è finanziata ogni anno dal governo di sinistra italiano quando interpreta il Concilio con una irrazionale premessa, inferenza e conclusione per respingere il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus se è stato interpretato nel papi Italiani nel corso dei secoli.
-Lionel Andrades
NOVEMBER 17, 2019
Operation Dustbin
DECEMBER 21, 2020
Without the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II the present two popes and all the bishops become conservative Catholics, whom Bishop Robert Barron would call rad trads.Without the false premise Bishop Barron himself is in the Trad Movement, which he has been criticizing, after he interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise
Without the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II the present two popes and all the bishops become conservative Catholics, whom Bishop Robert Barron would call rad trads.Without the false premise Bishop Barron himself is in the Trad Movement, which he has been criticizing, after he interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise. -Lionel Andrades
JANUARY 29, 2020
Bishop Robert Barron interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and this would be unethical even by secular standards in California
A. No, to be saved it is not enough to be any sort of member of the Catholic Church; it is necessary to be a living member.
A. No, no one can be saved outside the Catholic, Apostolic Roman Church, just as no one could be saved from the flood outside the Ark of Noah, which was a figure of the Church.-Catechism of Pope Pius X
MAY 20, 2018
For Bishop Robert Barron Lumen Gentium 16( invincible ignorance) refers to objectively seen non Catholics saved outside the Church.So for him and Pope Benedict the dogma EENS is obsolete and they search for substitute reasons to evangelize http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/05/bishop-robert-barron-lumen-gentium-16.html
A hypothetical case cannot be a practical exception to the dogma EENS.Period. Similarly the baptism of desire was never an exception to Feeneyite EENS.God made it this way. There is no baptism of desire case for us.
No comments:
Post a Comment