All the pontifical universities are not interpreting Vatican Council II with the rational premise and neither is Joseph Shaw

 

Joseph Shaw in Does Traditionis Custodes contradict the documents of Vatican II? (Life site news) refers to Sacrosanctum Concilium but avoids the real issue with Vatican Council II,the Latin Mass  and the traditionalists.This was known to Pope Benedict and the same policy is being followed by Pope Francis.

The Latin Mass is only permitted presently for those priests who interpret the Council  with a false premise and so create a rupture with Tradition (Athanasius Creed etc).  For example, in Britain.

The priests who accept Vatican Council II and interpret it with a rational premise , which does not contradict Tradition( Athanasius Creed) will not be given permission, even though they accept the Council.Since they would be affirming Feeneyite EENS.

Presently there is an interview of Eric Sammons by John Henry Weston on the Church teaching outside the Church there is no salvation. They have both kept the issue vague. Since they do not want to interpret Vatican Council II with the rational premise( and so affirm Feeneyite EENS) and neither do  they want to affirm Feeneyite EENS without the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance being exceptions. It is the same with Joseph Shaw.

Archbishop Thomas Gullickson avoids the false premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, EENS and other Magisterial documents.There is no rupture with Tradition for him.So he had appealed to the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II, as he does.

On the other hand the English bishops and priests interpret the Council with the false premise, so they are permitted by Cardinal Vince Nicols  to offer the Latin Mass. The ADL does not object.

Dr.Joseph Shaw a professor of philosophy interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise and teaches it at the Benedictine St.Benet Hall, Oxford.

But Fr. Stefano Visintin osb, former Dean of Theology and Rector of the Benedictine Pontifical University of St. Anselm, Rome, does not use the false premise  to interpret Vatican Council II, as did Rahner, Ratzinger, Congar and Kung.

It is the same with Una Voce International and the Latin Mass Societies in Britain.They depend upon the fake premise to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition since this is approved by the Left.

With the use of the fake premise there are exceptions created in Vatican Council II for EENS. So there is a new version of EENS. It is EENS with exceptions. This is also the understanding of John Henry Weston and Eric Sammons and Steve Skojec who has left 1Peter5.

So with the false premise, like the Left, the traditionalist and conservative Catholics, support ‘ a theology of religions’.

This is the theology at the ecumenical and inter religious meetings for the Catholic Bishops Conference in Britain.

There was no 'theology of religious pluralism' at the time of St. Benedict,St. Ignatius of Loyola, St.Dominic Guzman. They all interpreted EENS without the fake premise, of the correspondents of Life Site News,like Joseph Shaw.But today in all the educational institutions of the Benedictines, Jesuits and Dominicans this is the norm.All the pontifical universities are not interpreting Vatican Council II with the rational premise and neither is Joseph Shaw.-Lionel Andrades

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/contrary-to-pope-francis-unity-in-the-church-is-best-expressed-in-liturgical-diversity