Joseph Shaw in Does Traditionis Custodes contradict the documents of Vatican
II? (Life site news) refers to Sacrosanctum Concilium but avoids the real issue
with Vatican Council II,the Latin Mass
and the traditionalists.This was known to Pope Benedict and the same
policy is being followed by Pope Francis.
The
Latin Mass is only permitted presently for those priests who interpret the
Council with a false premise and so
create a rupture with Tradition (Athanasius Creed etc). For example, in Britain.
The
priests who accept Vatican Council II and interpret it with a rational premise
, which does not contradict Tradition( Athanasius Creed) will not be given
permission, even though they accept the Council.Since they would be affirming
Feeneyite EENS.
Archbishop
Thomas Gullickson avoids the false premise in the interpretation of Vatican
Council II, EENS and other Magisterial documents.There is no rupture with
Tradition for him.So he had appealed to the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II,
as he does.
On
the other hand the English bishops and priests interpret the Council with the
false premise, so they are permitted by Cardinal Vince Nicols to offer the Latin Mass. The ADL does not
object.
Dr.Joseph
Shaw a professor of philosophy interprets Vatican Council II with the false
premise and teaches it at the Benedictine St.Benet Hall, Oxford.
But
Fr. Stefano Visintin osb, former Dean of Theology and Rector of the Benedictine
Pontifical University of St. Anselm, Rome, does not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, as did
Rahner, Ratzinger, Congar and Kung.
It is
the same with Una Voce International and the Latin Mass Societies in
Britain.They depend upon the fake premise to interpret Vatican Council II as a
break with Tradition since this is approved by the Left.
With
the use of the fake premise there are exceptions created in Vatican Council II
for EENS. So there is a new version of EENS. It is EENS with exceptions. This
is also the understanding of John Henry Weston and Eric Sammons and Steve
Skojec who has left 1Peter5.
So with
the false premise, like the Left, the traditionalist and conservative
Catholics, support ‘ a theology of religions’.
This
is the theology at the ecumenical and inter religious meetings for the Catholic
Bishops Conference in Britain.
There
was no 'theology of religious pluralism' at the time of St. Benedict,St.
Ignatius of Loyola, St.Dominic Guzman. They all interpreted EENS without the
fake premise, of the correspondents of Life Site News,like Joseph Shaw.But today
in all the educational institutions of the Benedictines, Jesuits and Dominicans
this is the norm.All the pontifical universities are not interpreting Vatican
Council II with the rational premise and neither is Joseph Shaw.-Lionel Andrades
https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/contrary-to-pope-francis-unity-in-the-church-is-best-expressed-in-liturgical-diversity
1 comment:
You are correct about everything that you wrote except for your
Comments referencing Father Feeney...
Post a Comment