Bishop Peter Libasci and Fr. Georges de Laire are avoiding a Decree of Prohibitions against them by using a Fake Premise

 

BISHOP PETER LIBASCI AND FR. GEORGES DE LAIRE ARE AVOIDING A DECREE OF PROHIBITIONS AGAINST THEM

Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester, USA and Fr. Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar, and Mary Ellen Mahon, Director of Education and Catechesis, are using a Fake Premie to re-interpret Magisterial Documents, including Vatican Council II, Creeds, Catechisms and extra ecclesiam nulla salus and so avoid the Decree of Prohibitions of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.

Without the Fake Premise they would have to affirm EENS like Brother Andre Marie MICM, Prior at the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA.

For Sister Marie Therese MICM, Prioress, St. Benedict Center, N.H,the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance refer to physically invisible cases in 2021.So they cannot be practical exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.

Bishop Athanasius Schneider too confirmed this in an interview with Dr.Taylor Marshall.The latter said that there are no explicit cases of St. Thomas Aquinas’s implicit baptism of desire.He contradicted the position of the CDF and the Diocese of Manchester. However no Decree of Prohibitions have been issued against him or Dr. Taylor Marshall.

Aquinas held the strict interpretation of EENS and did not project invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire as practical exceptions.Since the baptism of desire always refers to an invisible case. This is something obvious. It was common sense over the centuries.

Fr.Georges de Laire has issued a Decree of Prohibitions against the St. Benedict Center, with the approval of the CDF. They want Brother Andre Marie to state that unknown cases of the baptism of desire (CCC 847-848) are known exceptions for traditional EENS.The St. Benedict Center refuses to affirm this irrationality.They are not using the False Premise.-Lionel Andrades