Q & A : What is the difference between your interpretation of Vatican Council II and every one else ?

 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Q. In brief can you tell us what is the difference between your interpretation of Vatican Council II and every one else ?

 A. I interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 , UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc  in Vatican Council II as always referring to hypothetical and invisible cases in 2021. So there are no objective exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus , the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Athanasius Creed ( all need the Catholic faith for salvation).There are none mentioned in the text of Vatican Council II.Neither are there any known, practical exceptions.

I accept the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance as being hypothetical cases. I do not reject them.But I do not project them as being practical exceptions to EENS. It was the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which made an objective mistake. 

So there are two interpretations of the Council today. One with the common False Premise and the other, mine, with the Ratioinal Premise. Their  conclusion is non traditional, heretical, schismatic and divisive. Mine is in harmony with the past Magisterium.It has the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition. So Catholics today have an option.-Lionel Andrades