Bishop Athanasius Schneider did well not to answer Raymond Arroyo’s loaded remark and question.The Left want him out of the way. They want him to make a mistake.
Arroyo referred to “the clear definitions articulated by Pope John Paul II, Pope Benedict XVI on Vatican Council II”, and Bishop Schneider did not pick up the bait.He was not yet ready to present an overhaul of the Council.What he has said in the interview with Dr. Taylor Marshall is enough. Any one is free to develop it and re-interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with Tradition.Raymond Arroyo and ‘the papal posse’ could do it.They don’t need Bishop Schneider. They could comment on the interview with Dr. Taylor Marshall.
For a renewal of the Church,mentioned in the interview with Arroyo, we have to
harmonize Vatican Council II with Tradition.We cannot go along with the present
George Soros - approved version of the Council.It is created with the False
Premise which Bishop Schneider exposed in the Dr.Taylor
Marshall-interview.
Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict’s
version of the Council is out. It’s obsolete.It is based upon the False Premise
which creates the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.We now have a rational option. -Lionel Andrades
Lionel Andrades
Writer on Vatican Council II being dogmatic and not only pastoral.It is in harmony with the extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Athanasius Creed etc.
It is found that there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other irrational. Since one uses a Rational Premise and the other a False Premise.One is Magisterial with the past Magisterium and the other, the common one, has an objective error and so cannot be Magisterial.It is the same with the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.
Why should Catholics choose the irrational version which is heretical, non traditional, liberal and schismatic, while a rational option is there, which is traditional ?.
__________________
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment