The "clear definitions articulated by Pope John Paul II, Pope Benedict XVI" on Vatican Council II is referred to by Raymond Arroyo : he means the Council interpreted with the False Premise with which he is comfortable

Bishop Athanasius Schneider was not ready to make the direct attack on Vatican Council II by mentioning  the Rational Premise in the interpretation of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc and neither was Raymond Arroyo at EWTN’s the World Over.This is not the time.

Arroyo said ,  “It seems there is an attempt to re-position Vatican Council II and re define it if you will,  after the clear definitions articulated by Pope John Paul II, Pope Benedict XVI… is that what is happening here ? Someone suggested that this may be the case.”

Bishop Athansius Schneider spoke of the need to restore the beauty of the Catholic faith and the truths received from the Apostles.

He did not make a direct attack on Vatican Council II.

Bishop Schneider has already indicated in the interview with Dr. Taylor Marshall that we can re-interpret Vatican Council II without the New Theology from Pope Pius XII ( on extra ecclesiam nulla salus) and Pope Paul VI ( on Vatican Council II).It’s simple. We do not confuse what is implicit as being explicit, invisible as being visible and unknown as being known and then project practical exceptions for the past ecclesiocentrism. This is the only way the Left can do away with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors (an Ecumenism of Return with no known exceptions) and the Athanasius Creed with no known exceptions, to all needing the Catholic faith for salvation.There are no literal cases of the baptism of desire, said Bishop Schneider to Dr. Taylor Marshall.

Bishop Schneider has to keep talking about the False Premise. It is something obvious.There are no visible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) in 2021. This is a fact.There are no known cases of being saved with the baptism of desire (LG 14) for the traditionalists in 1965-2021 at the Latin Mass. Nor at Mass in other rites and languages.-Lionel Andrades

Lionel Andrades

Writer on Vatican Council II being dogmatic and not only pastoral.It is in harmony with the extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Athanasius Creed etc.

It is found that there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other irrational. Since one uses a Rational Premise and the other a False Premise.One is Magisterial with the past Magisterium and the other, the common one, has an objective error  and so cannot be Magisterial.It is the same with the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.

Why should Catholics choose the irrational version which is heretical, non traditional, liberal and schismatic, while a rational option is there, which is traditional ?.

__________________