FSSP priests in Rome could begin to explain to Catholics in the parish, Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise, so that by Easter they can affirm the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church supported by text of Vatican Council II (Rational)

FSSP priests in Rome could begin to explain to the people, Catholics in the parish, Vatican Council II  interpreted with the Rational Premise, so that by Easter they can affirm the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church supported by text of Vatican Council II.

It would mean Vatican Council II can only be rational. Since orthodox text would support the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.There would be no exceptions.The Cushingite passages would not be exceptions.Passages which refer to hypothetical cases only would not  be exceptions.There would not be for -and -against -extra ecclesiam nulla salus passages in Vatican Council II.There would not be passages which support and oppose the Syllabus of Errors at the same time.There would only be passages supporting the old theology of the Syllabus of Errors.This is the result when the Council is interpreted without the Fake Premise and instead with the Rational Premise.

So at the FSSP church, Santissima Trinità dei Pellegrini, in Rome, inter-religious dialogue and ecumenism would be exclusivist, according to the traditional ecclesiocentric ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.This would be the only option with Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.

Without the False Premise there cannot be the New Theology, New Ecumenism, New Evangelisation and the rest of the liberalism which we are familiar with , since Pope Paul VI interpreted the Council with the False Premise.

At the Novus Ordo Mass on Good Friday we will continue to pray for the conversion of non Catholics and their discovery of the fullness of truth. However there would be no change in the ecclesiology of the Church before and after Vatican Council II, since the Council would have a continuity with the past and it would be the only rational option available. -Lionel Andrades