The sovereignists in Italy are interpreting Vatican Council II and Church Documetns with the False Premise like the Left and they create a break between Church and State. They interpret Vatican Council II like George Soros and not me.

 

Matteo Salvini’s Lega political party held a meeting in Rome recently it was reported.There was also one in Milan. There were video conferences with Viktor Orban in Hungary and Mateuoz Morawicki in Poland. The media call them  sovereignists as opposed to globalists.The Lega is still aligned with Marine Le Pen in France and Alternative fur Deutschland in Germany.

The sovereignists who are committed to Christian culture and the belief in God are opposed by the globalists, committed to Satan, the Masons and other preparing for the coming of the Anti Christ in the these end times.

Globalism should have Christ as its center, since Christ is God, ruler of the universes and the world.Christ must not only be at the center of our hearts but also of society, culture and legislation.Tomorrow we celebrate the feast of Christ the King, King of the universe.

But the sovereignists in Italy are interpreting Vatican Council II and Church Documents like the globalists. They use the False Premise like the Left and then create a break between Church and State. They interpret Vatican Council II like George Soros and not me.

If like me they interpreted Vatican Council II then the Council would support the historical Castholic culture and Tradition in Europe.

Now without the support of the Catholic heirarcy  and the popes  the sovereignists are handing power to Satan.

The Kingship of Jesus does not extend, for example, to LGBT rights.

So how do they take it all back ?

They respond with a philosophical observation which avoids the common mistake in the Leftist Catholic theology. They announce that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance in 2021.They follow the recent example of  Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall.

With this announcement the sovereignists in Europe will have the hierarchy of the Catholic Church having to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so support them.

This could be the common policy with Mateuz Morewicke in Poland and Marine le Pen in France.With Victor Orban it would working for the Social Reign of Christ the King in society.It would mean Cardinal Peter Erdo  would have to interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with the the exclusivist understanding of salvation as held by St.Elizabeth of Hungary, whose feast was celebrated the other day in the Catholic Church.

Salvini has decided that the sovereignists will stay within the European Union . But do they stay as Catholics who  interpret Vatican Council II with a Rational or False Premise ? What is the approach to religion and the Catholic faith ? Is it the same as the European Union ? Will it be Lefebvrist and liberal ? The Lefebvrist interpretation of Vatican Council II is supported by the liberals in the European Union.

They cannot use the Lefevrist and liberal model of theology.

It is because of Lefebvrist theology on salvation that the Lega leaders are not proclaiming the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics in harmony with Vatican Council II.

The Fake Premise creates exceptions and so makes traditional exclusivist doctrine obsolete. It is asked : why proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King in all legislation, with Traditional Mission based on exclusivist doctrine and the non separation of Church and State, when Vatican Council II says outside the Church there is salvation, according to the Lefebvrists, liberals and popes ?

Presently the popes use the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents and so are heretical, schismatic,non Magisterial and non traditional on the Council.It has to be this way for them, since they use the False Premise. This can be avoided with the use of the Rational Premise and then they will have the hermeneutic of continuity and they will be Magisterial.

The Lefebvrist Roberto dei Mattei and his media is not corrrectng the poltical interpretation of Vatican Council II and is not informing the conservative politicians in Italy about their error.

The Lega, Fratelli Italia and other political parties interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King and this has to corrected.

They simply look at LG 8, LG 16 etc as being hypothetical and every thing else comes in line. -Lionel Andrades

NOVEMBER 20, 2016

When we get rid of the Rahnerian theology to interpret Vatican Council II then Catholics in general can know the importance of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation : Feast of Christ the King

When we get rid of the Rahnerian theology to interpret Vatican Council II then Catholics in general can know the importance of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation. They will know that they should vote for only those political parties which hold Jesus and his teachings in the Catholic Church as a model for all politics and social legislation.

The Rahnerian theology is based on imaginary cases being non imaginary, invisible cases are visible. It is with this irrational premise that most Catholics interpret Vatican Council II.They assume that the baptism of desire for example refers to a visible case in 2016 without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. So naturally this visible case would be an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.
So for most Catholics there is salvation outside the Church, there is known salvation outside the Church. So it is no more necessary to have an ecumenism of return or that all non Catholics enter the Church for salvation.Similarly it is no more necessary that all political and social legislation have as its centre Jesus Christ.It is with this heresy in ignorance that Catholics, including popes, cardinals and bishops, vote for secular parties whose agenda in general has as its model Satan and his priorities.
On the feast of Christ the King we see that the majority of Catholic lay people and religious including ecclesiastics do not vote for Catholic political parties which support the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation.Instead they vote for secular political organisations.
They do not believe that Jesus Christ as known in the Catholic Church must be at the centre of all political and social legislation.

They do not believe that all need 'faith and baptism' for salvation(Vatican Council II, Ad Gentes 7).So to avoid the fires of Hell all need to formally enter the Church,is not more the priority in social and political legislation. Even the popes, cardinals and bishops do not believe in this any more. This is why in Italy the majority of Catholics vote for political parites like the Partito Democratico, Alleanza Nationale etc which do not support the Social Reign of Christ the King.
Instead the popes and cardinals have accepted the New Theology of Rahner and Ratzinger which suggests that there is known salvation outside the Church.This is their view even though there is no known salvation, practically known, outside the Church. Neither has any one in the past seen personally someone saved outside the Church.
Yet this is how Vatican Council II is interpreted. Since there is known salvation of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance without the baptism of water, there is no more the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Since the dogma on exclusive salvation does not practically exist any more there is no more an ecumenism of return.

Since there is alleged known salvation outside the Church it is not necessary that the Social Reign of Christ the King be a priority for the popes and Catholics. People are saved in their religions even if they are not Catholic.
This Rahnerian theology is also accepted by the SSPX and the other traditionalists.

So Catholics today do not feel obligated, in Italy for example, to vote for Militia Christi or Forza Nuova.-Lionel Andrades


November 19, 2016

On the feast of Christ the King we see that the majority of Catholic lay people and religious including ecclesiastics do not vote for Catholic political parties which support the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation.Instead they vote for secular political organisations

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/11/on-feast-of-christ-king-we-see-that.html

MONDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2017

Repost :Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it.

NOVEMBER 26, 2017

The Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it.

The Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it.One does not have to be a traditionalist who rejects Vatican Council II(premise-free).Traditionalists should not reject Vatican Council II( premise-free).

Yes reject Vatican Council II(Cushingite)which would infer that there is known salvation outside the Church and so the past ecclesiology of the Church is rejected upon which is based the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King.Vatican Council (Cushingite) must continue to be rejected by the traditionalists. All Catholics should reject it.

For me the Social Reign of Christ the King means encouraging every one to be Catholic, without forcing them.So the political laws must be based on traditional Catholic doctrine and theology.Outside the Church there is no known salvation.So it is important for every one to save their soul and be a member of the Catholic Church.Vatican Council II states all need faith and baptism for salvation(Ad Gentes 7)

Catholics should only vote for Catholic political parties which affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King based on Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II.
This is extra ecclesiam nulla salus without the premise and Vatican Council II without the premise.

In the CMTV Download program on the Social Reign of Christ the King it is said every one does not need to be a Catholic. Bradley Eli interpretsextra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II with Cushingite theology.So for him the baptism of desire etc as refers to known examples of people saved outside the Church.Known? Where are these known examples? So since for him and the CMTV team, and the rest of Detroit, there are known exceptions to the traditional exclusivisit theology of the Catholic Church, every one does not need to be a member of the Church for salvation. So proclaiming the Social Reign of Christ the King, with their new theology,Cushingite theology, is not a priority in a pluralistic state for them.