Alberto Melloni is dishonest. He uses a False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II

 

Alberto  Melloni is dishonest. He uses a False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II.-Lionel Andrades

APRIL 20, 2021

Almost all the TV Stations in Italy have had to interview Alberto Melloni and project his non Magisterial interpretation of Vatican Council II with the false premise

 Almost all the TV Stations in Italy have had to interview Alberto Melloni and project his non Magisterial interpretation of Vatican Council II with the false premise. - Lionel Andrades

FEBRUARY 26, 2021

The new Italian Prime Minister Mario Dragi accepts Prof. Alberto Melloni's official interpretation of Vatican Council II which is dishonest

 

 The new Italian Prime Minister Mario Dragi  accepts Prof. Alberto Melloni's official interpretation of Vatican Council II which is dishonest.

Melloni's Bologna School, is funded by the Italian leftist government.

Melloni like Dragi unethically uses a false premise to make Vatican Council II emerge as a rupture with the Italy's popes and saints over history. -Lionel Andrades

DECEMBER 7, 2020

If Prof. Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School would interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise of the New Theology, the Italian Government may not continue to finance him.He would be taking the Catholic Church back to Tradition

 If Prof. Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School would interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise of the New Theology, the Italian Government may not continue to finance him.He would be taking the Catholic Church back to Tradition. -Lionel Andrades

John XXIII Foundation for Religious Sciences (FSCIRE), the "Bologna School, interprets Vatican Council II with the common false premise.There is no transparency on this issue

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/john-xxiii-foundation-for-religious.html

 FEBRUARY 22, 2020

Italian Government finances Alberto Melloni's Bologna School with a million euros annually : it uses a false premise, inference and conclusion to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition

The Italian government is funding Alberto Melloni's John XXIII Foundation for Religious Sciences (FSCIRE), the headquarters of the so-called "Bologna School,"1 guaranteed another yearly million-euro funding for 2020–2022.Melloni uses the irrational model to interpret Vatican Council II. It is only with a false premise, inference and conclusion that he makes the Council a rupture with Tradition. He could choose the rational premise, inference and conclusion.

  

_________________________________________



    

___________________________________________

   

  

 With this rational model, the  Vatican, the Bologna School, Archbishop Pegro and Cardinal Matteo Zuppi , would not be contradicting the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.

ATHANASIUS CREED

'Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the catholic faith. Which faith unless every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly...'

___________________________________

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 24, 2020

Pope Francis interprets the Creeds with a false premise, inference and conclusion. This was un precedented over the centuries.

Pope Francis interprets the Creeds with a false premise, inference and conclusion. This was un precedented over the centuries.

Pope Pius XII and Pope John XXIII and the following popes, interpreted extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with a false premise.Pope Paul VI and the following popes interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise.

Now Pope Francis interprets the Creeds and Vatican Council Ii with the false premise and so creates a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition on ecumenism, traditional ecclesiocentic mission, liturgy with the old exclusivist ecclesiology and traditional ecclesiology.It's a different Catholic Church now.The whole Church is following him in the error, conservatives and liberals.

Bishop Schneider, Maike Hickson and John Henry Weston continue to interpret LG 8 and UR 3 in Vatican Council II as exceptions to EENS. Bishop Bernard Fellay  did this continously. He never corrected himself. He probably will go to the end of his life, with this error, like Fr.Nicholas Gruner   and John Vennari.

If the popes interpret the Creeds without the false premise, like me,  they would be opposed by the Jewish Left.There would be persecution.Now there is support.

The two popes do not affirm the Creeds to avoid a persecution of the Church. They have changed the faith-teachings of the Church.

So the official Profession of Faith and Oath of Office for Cardinals, Bishops, Rectors, Superiors and Parish Priests are mere words supporting heresy and dissent.-Lionel Andrades

_____________________________