Now the Franciscans of the Immaculate are in a position to ask the cardinals, bishops and the Commissar to please accept Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and not impose the False Premise upon them.

 

Now the Franciscans of the Immaculate are in a position to ask the cardinals, bishops and the Commissar to please accept Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and not impose the False Premise upon them. They could ask Fr. Sabino Ardito sdb, the Commissar, and Fr. Gianfranco Ghirlanda sj, the Canonical Consultant to make an announcement saying that they affirm Vatican Council II only with the Rational Premise.

Also the expected Apostolic Visitors and new Commissars for the Ecclesia Dei communities could announce that they accept Vatican Council II with the Rational and not Fake Premise. They also expect all religious communities to do the same.

In general, Cardinal Braz de Avez must clarify that all religious communities in the Catholic Church must only interpret Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance) with the Rational Premise. It is unethical to use the Irrational Premise to create a false rupture with Catholic Tradition (EENS, Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX etc).

So the Latin and Novus Ordo Mass could only be allowed for religious communities which interpret Vatican Council II rationally, traditionally and honestly, without the use of the False Premise.

There are no objective cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church in the present times (1965-2021).So the New Theology which says outside the Church there is salvation has to be rejected. It is irrational and unethical for a Catholic to use the New Theology which is propped by a Fake Premise which suggests outside the Church there are known people saved without faith and the baptism of water.

The Franciscans of the Immaculate and the Ecclesia Dei traditionalist communities could confirm that they interpret Vatican Council II with the Old Theology i.e.  without confusing what is invisible as being visible, subjective as being objective, implicit as being explicit and objective as being objective.LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are always invisible, subjective, implicit, theoretical, speculative and hypothetical, only. They are not objective examples of salvation in 2021.

So Vatican Council II is no more an issue for the Franciscans of the Immaculate as it is for the liberals. Without the False Premise Cardinal Walter Kasper cannot cite the Council. LG 16 for example, is not a break with Tradition, it does not contradict the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).Since it always  refers to an invisible and hypothetical case in 2021.

The Franciscans of the Immaculate could object if Fr. Sabino Ardito still interprets Vatican Council II with the False Premise. Also it would be unethical to allow the other community of the Franciscans of the Immaculate, who offer Holy Mass only in the vernacular, to interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms and the dogma EENS, with a False Premise.

Fr. Rosario Sammarco f.i, the Rector, of the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate seminary, Tiburtina, Rome, must ask the seminarians to only interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise.

There can once again be unity in doctrine and theology between the two groups of the Franciscans of the Immaculate who were divided by Pope Francis.The division was created with the Fake Premise used to interpret the Council and which was rejected Fr. Stefano Manelli f.i, the founder of the community. So Pope Francis closed the seminary at Boccea, Rome and placed a ban on the Third Order, the lay branch of the community.

The Commissars of both groups of the Franciscans of the Immaculate Fr. Sabino Ardito and Fr. Gianfranco Ghirlanda must clarify that they themselves interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and not the Irrational version.-Lionel Andrades